I had to go back and look at the rule, because its been so long.
Yesterday's situation was actually obstruction, not interference.
There does not have to be contact. The defensive player, if not in the act of fielding a ball, only has to be in a position to force the base runner to alter his natural route.
In yesterday's case, there were two obvious obstructions. I dont know if the ump called both of them, but it doesn't really matter. The runner is automatically awarded the base he was heading toward, but the ump can award another base, if it is his judgement that the runner, unimpeded, would have progressed that far safely.
If the ump called both obstructions, its a rule book call. If he called only one, its a judgement call. Its not a reviewable call in either case.
Yesterday's situation was actually obstruction, not interference.
There does not have to be contact. The defensive player, if not in the act of fielding a ball, only has to be in a position to force the base runner to alter his natural route.
In yesterday's case, there were two obvious obstructions. I dont know if the ump called both of them, but it doesn't really matter. The runner is automatically awarded the base he was heading toward, but the ump can award another base, if it is his judgement that the runner, unimpeded, would have progressed that far safely.
If the ump called both obstructions, its a rule book call. If he called only one, its a judgement call. Its not a reviewable call in either case.