Derek
Table Setter
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2009
- Messages
- 18,221
- Reaction score
- 31,606
- Points
- 148
Didn't BJ start going by Melvin at the end of his career?Contrary to popular belief, BJ Upton and Justin Upton are different people
Didn't BJ start going by Melvin at the end of his career?Contrary to popular belief, BJ Upton and Justin Upton are different people
This reminds me of when Amed Rosario and Franklin Barreto came up at roughly the same time as couldn't miss SS prospects and for whatever reason never developed the plate discipline to succeed in the majors. But they've since been traded and at least turned into something for the teams that traded them. An abundance of talent is a good thing regardless of how it's distributed.Also, not to be Debbie Downer, but the likely outcome is that out of Gimenez, Miller, Arias, Freeman, Rocchio, etc... maybe 2 will turn out to be legitimately good, everyday players.
That's why you acquire all of these guys, so you can let them naturally weed each other out.
Hey, he said BJ.Didn't BJ start going by Melvin at the end of his career?
Addison Russell and Javier Baez comes to mind as another one. I know Russell had some other shit going on, but he also wasn't that good.This reminds me of when Amed Rosario and Franklin Barreto came up at roughly the same time as couldn't miss SS prospects and for whatever reason never developed the plate discipline to succeed in the majors. But they've since been traded and at least turned into something for the teams that traded them. An abundance of talent is a good thing regardless of how it's distributed.
Lol....You got me and I knew that, a matter fact the big screen was talking about itContrary to popular belief, BJ Upton and Justin Upton are different people
I never implied "this year" even though I wouldn't be afraid to trade Hernandez at the AS break if Miller is hitting the shit out of the ball. If it gains them a good prospect then count me in. If it's just a salary dump then I'm not in favor of it. Again, everything depends on Miller's performance.But not this year. The need is first base or shortstop. Worry about next season next year.
There's very little chance that Miller or Freeman don't become productive major league players. How productive can be questioned. Arias will at least be a defensive specialist with power for a SS. Rocchio's upside is huge, but he's a lower level prospect so anything can happen. The list of quality MIF prospects is long enough that there will still be plenty to "weed themselves out" if a couple are traded.Also, not to be Debbie Downer, but the likely outcome is that out of Gimenez, Miller, Arias, Freeman, Rocchio, etc... maybe 2 will turn out to be legitimately good, everyday players.
That's why you acquire all of these guys, so you can let them naturally weed each other out.
I think you're far too high on the outlook of our prospects. I'd say it's more likely than not that one of Freeman/Miller isn't even in the majors in 5 years, and I love both of them.There's very little chance that Miller or Freeman don't become productive major league players. How productive can be questioned. Arias will at least be a defensive specialist with power for a SS. Rocchio's upside is huge, but he's a lower level prospect so anything can happen. The list of quality MIF prospects is long enough that there will still be plenty to "weed themselves out" if a couple are traded.
Their bats profile as league average hitters at the very least. That's their floor, but it's more likely that they are both above average hitters with modest power. Miller has a bit more than Freeman. I'm not concerned with either of them TBH and that's not being "too high" on them. That's understanding what they are.I think you're far too high on the outlook of our prospects. I'd say it's more likely than not that one of Freeman/Miller isn't even in the majors in 5 years, and I love both of them.
Maybe I'm just overly pragmatic.
I just don't agree at all that either of them has that high of a floor. Every single one of these guys could be bums in the majors.Their bats profile as league average hitters at the very least. That's their floor, but it's more likely that they are both above average hitters with modest power. Miller has a bit more than Freeman. I'm not concerned with either of them TBH and that's not being "too high" on them. That's understanding what they are.
A little sad, but true.I just don't agree at all that either of them has that high of a floor. Every single one of these guys could be bums in the majors.
Yeah well, the guys that have produced in the majors could be bums too. There is no guarantee for anything in baseball. What you can take to the bank is that there are very few players or prospects that can swing a baseball bat like Owen Miller and Tyler Freeman. We're not talking about lower level guys here or I'd be in agreement with you. Hell, Miller skipped high A ball altogether.I just don't agree at all that either of them has that high of a floor. Every single one of these guys could be bums in the majors.
I just don't agree at all that either of them has that high of a floor. Every single one of these guys could be bums in the majors.
Yes and now 2 years later he's up 1 level and 24 years old. He isn't exactly on the fastest pace ever for a player.Yeah well, the guys that have produced in the majors could be bums too. There is no guarantee for anything in baseball. What you can take to the bank is that there are very few players or prospects that can swing a baseball bat like Owen Miller and Tyler Freeman. We're not talking about lower level guys here or I'd be in agreement with you. Hell, Miller skipped high A ball altogether.