- Joined
- Jul 15, 2008
- Messages
- 34,149
- Reaction score
- 64,564
- Points
- 148
I get what you're saying, but I'd counter by asking...
What's more relevant to the 2020 Cleveland Browns? Things Baker did two years and two head coaches ago when teams had very limited NFL tape on him?
That's certainly one important question. I'd start off saying this -- teams had plenty of tape on Mayfield by the mid-point of his first season. Despite teams having progressively even more tape on him as that season wore on, his performance generally stayed the same or got better. And of course, they had more tape of him in that system than they do in this system right now. Yet, he excelled.
Or the things he's doing right now now that the NFL has a much better idea of what he's capable of?
"Right now" includes being only 3 regular season games into a brand new new system, with a new HC and new OC, a massively truncated offseason devoid of the usual minicamps, and without a single preseason game for him to begin getting used to the new system.
Given all that, I'd say the latter half of 2018 provides a better measure of what Baker ultimately can do than the first three games of this season. However...we could probably go around all day on this, and not really know which one of us is more correct/less wrong. It might be you.
Truth is, by the time we get into the second half of this season, the "new system" excuse will be far less valid, and by the end of the season, we'll have a much, much better idea of Baker's likely trajectory moving forward. And it really won't matter who was right or wrong. We'll all either be happy that he showed consistent improvement, or bummed that he didn't. And "I told you so" will be pretty irrelevant either way!
Last edited: