Los216
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2012
- Messages
- 34,870
- Reaction score
- 40,690
- Points
- 148
I have nothing against Garland and couldn't care less about his agent. It's a tad bit defensive to suggest that anyone who can't obviously see him as the future at PG for this team must have ulterior motives. If he's going to be our full time PG playmaker I want to see it on the court. IMO he hasn't come anywhere near showing that yet. He's going to get his chance to start this season so we'll see.
And you think it's fair to expect him to be our full time playmaker at PG while playing him next to an undersized scoring guard?
This is what I don't understand with people who are critical of Darius Garland. Is he supposed to just overcome playing next to Colin Sexton? How about you don't play him next to Sexton and maybe you could actually let him develop.
This reminds me so much about how people were critical of Steph Curry because he wasn't as good at scoring early on as Monte Ellis was when Monte Ellis should never have been starting next to Steph in the first place.
So if Darius Garland is ever going to be good here it's all on him to overcome the ineptitiude of this team building strategy?