In 2016 the FO was willing to trade eight prospects, one of which had a little MLB experience, for an impact reliever with 2.5 years of control and an impact bat with 1.5 years of control.
Among those prospects were two MLB ready OFs...both debuted the next year.
Three relievers, one of which was much like Sandlin, and another who immediately debuted in MLB.
A starting pitching prospect, then in A+ ball.
One of the elite catching prospects in baseball, then in A+, and debuted the next year.
A power hitting SS in A+.
At the beginning of 2016, Frazier was rated as our #2 prospect with a 60 FV.
Sheffield was our #5, a 50 FV.
Mejia was #12, a 45+.
Allen was #16, a 45+.
Armstrong was #20, a 40+.
Chang was #25, a 40.
But by the end of the season, Mejia was rated #1, a 55. Allen was #4, a 50, and Chang was #9, a 45.
Since those trade proposals were deadline deals, the latter valuations were closer.
The FO was willing to trade basically five of our top ten prospects, a good looking young MLB reliever, and two other relievers....in the same day.
As it turned out, the Lucroy deal fell thru, but the loss of those eight prospects wouldn't have hurt us at all.
Instructive is the fact that Sherman had agreed to come on board, but wasn't yet officially in the ownership group...and he advocated for those trades.
The idea that this front office and ownership won't make these kind of moves now, or that such moves would hinder the future, flies in the face of historical fact.
You can attempt to make a list of equivalent prospects today, and any list would naturally be open to debate, but lets try it. (We presently have no prospects rated above 50 FV)
Allen, jr, for Sheffield
Valera for Mejia
Arias for Frazier
Tena for Chang
Palacios for Allen
Sandlin for Armstrong
Mikolajchak for Heller
Broom for Feyereisen
Among those prospects were two MLB ready OFs...both debuted the next year.
Three relievers, one of which was much like Sandlin, and another who immediately debuted in MLB.
A starting pitching prospect, then in A+ ball.
One of the elite catching prospects in baseball, then in A+, and debuted the next year.
A power hitting SS in A+.
At the beginning of 2016, Frazier was rated as our #2 prospect with a 60 FV.
Sheffield was our #5, a 50 FV.
Mejia was #12, a 45+.
Allen was #16, a 45+.
Armstrong was #20, a 40+.
Chang was #25, a 40.
But by the end of the season, Mejia was rated #1, a 55. Allen was #4, a 50, and Chang was #9, a 45.
Since those trade proposals were deadline deals, the latter valuations were closer.
The FO was willing to trade basically five of our top ten prospects, a good looking young MLB reliever, and two other relievers....in the same day.
As it turned out, the Lucroy deal fell thru, but the loss of those eight prospects wouldn't have hurt us at all.
Instructive is the fact that Sherman had agreed to come on board, but wasn't yet officially in the ownership group...and he advocated for those trades.
The idea that this front office and ownership won't make these kind of moves now, or that such moves would hinder the future, flies in the face of historical fact.
You can attempt to make a list of equivalent prospects today, and any list would naturally be open to debate, but lets try it. (We presently have no prospects rated above 50 FV)
Allen, jr, for Sheffield
Valera for Mejia
Arias for Frazier
Tena for Chang
Palacios for Allen
Sandlin for Armstrong
Mikolajchak for Heller
Broom for Feyereisen