Alec
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- May 21, 2011
- Messages
- 7,357
- Reaction score
- 10,166
- Points
- 123
yeah wtf?Nance is definitely injury prone. There's really no argument to the contrary.
yeah wtf?Nance is definitely injury prone. There's really no argument to the contrary.
I'll make one. Starting with his rookie year he played in 63, 63, 66, 67, 56 (out of 65), and this year 29 of 49 games. Those first two years with the Lakers when he played in 63 of 82 games I don't know if he was injured or just didn't get put in some nights. He wasn't a starter.Nance is definitely injury prone. There's really no argument to the contrary.
You really put a lot of thought into that "argument to the contrary" didn't you?yeah wtf?
I don't see an argument. I see proof that he's missed 98 games in 5 and a half years. He was a rotation player from the start in LA.I'll make one. Starting with his rookie year he played in 63, 63, 66, 67, 56 (out of 65), and this year 29 of 49 games. Those first two years with the Lakers when he played in 63 of 82 games I don't know if he was injured or just didn't get put in some nights. He wasn't a starter.
By the way, he's not injured now - he has an illness.
I guess it depends on your definition of injury prone.
I wonder if Nance’s Crohn’s (and immunosuppressants) makes him injury-prone. Combined with his all-out playing style.Neither Allen or Nance are "injury prone". Love is injury prone due to his age and number of games played.
LeBron is out right now. Is he "injury prone"?