midgetstilts
Warrick Ninja
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2005
- Messages
- 886
- Reaction score
- 374
- Points
- 63
Admittedly, I pretty much sit back and read posts, and I must say that I love this board. But as a Cavs fan out here in Los Angeles that gets excited to get home from work so I can watch every Cavs game on league pass, I am surprised that everyone believes Haslem is a better player then Gooden. I'm wondering if I'm missing out on something that Cleveland based fans would know about him off the court, that I'm not taking into account.
I don't think Gooden is getting a fair shake. The only thing that excites me about Gooden being replaced in the starting lineup possibly is that I have no doubt Gooden can create his own scoring which is something that would be very useful to our second unit. However I believe much of the inconsistency that we saw last year, was a result of him receiving sporadic minutes and being jerked in and out of games and replaced by Traylor for that stretch of time in the starting lineup.
Two things have bothered me to this point this offseason:
1.) The way Gooden has been treated by our fans and by the management in general.
My take: He's young. He's played for something like 7 coaches, and I think given a little more time, he will prove to be the running, mobile, consistent double double guy that we all seek. He has two main drawbacks at this point that were blatently apparent during last season. His tendency to settle for 18-20 foot jumpers (which Z and traylor were much more dependable at) and his bouts of inconsistency. But the opposite end of that was when he'd be the only offensive sparkplug when Z got in foul trouble early and when Lebron would be easing into his role as the game developed. I simply don't trust Haslem to be able to create his own offense like Drew has the ability to do (at least more so then most). Haslem has a great midrange jumper, and playing opposite of Z i'm sure he'd flourish, but unless Haslem is a huge defensive upgrade (i don't know...i didn't see enough of him), then I think we're spending money that could be better spent elsewhere.
2.) Not resigning Traylor.
My Take: He was a stud at the end of the season. One of the only consistent players we had on our bench. That midrange jumper was incredibly reliable. And for the 1.76 million he would have cost, he was a steal. I know we needed every last cent we could get, but if you asked me who I would rather have: Traylor and 4.14 million, or Haslem for 6 mill a year, I'd take Traylor in a second
Those concerns being said, I love the signing of Hughes. He was my favorite. If were going to overpay, which we had to this summer, we may as well get the most well rounded guy. He can rebound, pass, defend, and spell the point. The others were all inferior to Hughes in that regard. And in his defense as has been pointed out in a few other posts, when Hughes takes just a step inside the arc, his accuracy was near flawless. I expect his percentage to be about 30% this season, now that his thumb has had time to heal. He was almost at 35% last year before that injury.
Thank you moderators and creators for making a forum where I don't have to wallow through the trolls and generally ignorant posters that a forum like ESPN has.
I don't think Gooden is getting a fair shake. The only thing that excites me about Gooden being replaced in the starting lineup possibly is that I have no doubt Gooden can create his own scoring which is something that would be very useful to our second unit. However I believe much of the inconsistency that we saw last year, was a result of him receiving sporadic minutes and being jerked in and out of games and replaced by Traylor for that stretch of time in the starting lineup.
Two things have bothered me to this point this offseason:
1.) The way Gooden has been treated by our fans and by the management in general.
My take: He's young. He's played for something like 7 coaches, and I think given a little more time, he will prove to be the running, mobile, consistent double double guy that we all seek. He has two main drawbacks at this point that were blatently apparent during last season. His tendency to settle for 18-20 foot jumpers (which Z and traylor were much more dependable at) and his bouts of inconsistency. But the opposite end of that was when he'd be the only offensive sparkplug when Z got in foul trouble early and when Lebron would be easing into his role as the game developed. I simply don't trust Haslem to be able to create his own offense like Drew has the ability to do (at least more so then most). Haslem has a great midrange jumper, and playing opposite of Z i'm sure he'd flourish, but unless Haslem is a huge defensive upgrade (i don't know...i didn't see enough of him), then I think we're spending money that could be better spent elsewhere.
2.) Not resigning Traylor.
My Take: He was a stud at the end of the season. One of the only consistent players we had on our bench. That midrange jumper was incredibly reliable. And for the 1.76 million he would have cost, he was a steal. I know we needed every last cent we could get, but if you asked me who I would rather have: Traylor and 4.14 million, or Haslem for 6 mill a year, I'd take Traylor in a second
Those concerns being said, I love the signing of Hughes. He was my favorite. If were going to overpay, which we had to this summer, we may as well get the most well rounded guy. He can rebound, pass, defend, and spell the point. The others were all inferior to Hughes in that regard. And in his defense as has been pointed out in a few other posts, when Hughes takes just a step inside the arc, his accuracy was near flawless. I expect his percentage to be about 30% this season, now that his thumb has had time to heal. He was almost at 35% last year before that injury.
Thank you moderators and creators for making a forum where I don't have to wallow through the trolls and generally ignorant posters that a forum like ESPN has.