weepinwillow
the nba: it's faaantastic
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2009
- Messages
- 4,318
- Reaction score
- 9,223
- Points
- 113
These are good points. You need a couple of teams competing for a KD or Lebron in any given offseason to bring the value up on expiring deals. Nobody is dumping salary to get into the Otto Porter sweepstakes.I think an issue here over the past several years is that many (including probably Dan Gilbert) have completely overestimated the value of our expiring contracts around the league.
There is probably bias here from the Baron Davis deal that got us Kyrie a decade ago. We struck gold on that deal - it was only especially good because we hit long-shot lotto odds. Would it have been as good if we ended up with Brandon Knight or Jimmer Fredette later in the lottery instead?
A lot of us think that because Dan is willing to eat a bad contract, we should get a big return. The fact is that other teams aren't willing to spend much to dump contracts anymore. It's the same reason we aren't willing to trade Kevin Love.
EDIT: I'll add that overall I don't think Altman has been that bad. We've had some bad lotto luck and a couple of his gambles (e.g., KPJ, Drummond) haven't paid off. In terms of trades, it takes 2 teams to agree. You can't force a team to give you a dollar if you only have 50 cents (even if you think you have a dollar).
Kevin Love has been a bad deal from the get go. You competed with yourself on this. Cavs absolutely knew his market value, as he was basically on the trade block the second he grabbed his bags at the airport arriving from Minny into Cleveland. Non "alternate universe draft pick" roster moves I wish the Cavs had made through this rebuild:
* let Kev walk in 2019 unless you could get him extended on a 2 or 3 year deal vs the 4 year deal. You could have still offered the max money, but your timeline would have made more sense.. and nobody was going to offer him those kind of dollars, and his contract would have been more tradable at the end.
* Don't trade for AD. He was a putrid fit in every way. Even for nothing, he was a net negative in terms of development minutes, style of play you wanted your team to engage in, etc.
* Looked to re-sign TT to a similar deal Boston signed him for. He is over the hill, and not contributing like he used to, but if you don't have Andre, you have a spot for TT, and he has proven amenable to coming off the bench, provides the veteran leadership you want and is a good story for the Cavs. This may not have been much of an option, but it was a total non-option with Drummond on board.
We will see where this goes. I hate only banking on lottery luck and drafting. I love moves like the Allen trade, and signing guys to extensions like Nance (who was found sort of similarly to Allen). If you look at the best team in the NBA today (at least via standings) their best players were taken at 13 and 27 (and Gobert needed to be gotten via a trade with Denver... Erick Green and cash??? WTF, Denver??), so you don't need to always bank on having the lottery go your way. You do need a solid system for player development, team stability, and strong scouting departments.
That last sentence does not read like the Cavaliers. and that is what ultimately worries me about the franchise. I just don't trust Gilbert to provide a stable enough situation for the team to compete the way a small market needs to.