He's the guy who is damning the Fates after Kyrie dropped 93 points in back to back games two days after he tweeted his Korver/Irving comparison.
He's also the guy who is now spinning that he just talked about their play "this season", but that's not what he actually said. He made the unqualified -- not limited to just this season -- comparisons that:
Kyle Korver is so much better than Kyrie Irving. It's not even close.
It's not even a debate. You do not understand basketball if you think Kyrie Irving is better than Kyle Korver.
And he's now claiming that "I never said Kyrie Irving wasn't a really good player. I just said he wasn't as good as Korver this season (and he hadn't been)."
Actually, he said it "wasn't even close", and that anyone who disagreed "doesn't understand basketball." So think about that for a second. If he believed Kyrie was "a really good player", but "wasn't even close to Korver", then Korver should be a first ballot HOF'er.
At least he's half right, because there's certainly someone in this debate who doesn't understand basketball....