MLB.com is infatuated with Condon, as evidenced yesterday with the article comparing him to Aaron Judge and Stanton, however even with such lofty praise, they still gave him just a 40 run grade, 55 arm grade and 50 fielding grade. I think those are major concerns. I mean I've seen Cleveland fans complain about bazzana being another MI guy and where to play him, but where do you play a Condon, who's biggest supporters don't even put his defensive grades in a favorable light ? They give Bazzana 60 run, 50 field and 50 arm, but I'll gladly take the trade off in 5 points for arm for 20 plus more speed. That shows you're going to cover a hell of a lot more ground.
Let's say you put Condon in right, Bazzana in center. If Condon can't run or throw equal to the position then you're banking his entire career off his power being legit, and not based on what bat he's using to put up these numbers mixed up with facing average at best pitching this year. With Bazzana at least he's an all fields hitter and has phenomenal patience and can steal you 20+ bases. Let's say at worst he has Grady Sizemore arm strength, but he can cover the same amount of ground. I don't think that's a bad scenario.
Ralphy Velazquez is slower than dog shit and they still gave him a 35 run grade. I don't think Condon is that slow, but you should get the point.
On the other hand, Jacob Cozart, PJ Morlando, Josh Hartle, Drew Beam, Mike Sirota, Peyton Tolle being available with our next 2 or 3 picks would be an amazing draft