Urban
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2009
- Messages
- 7,941
- Reaction score
- 11,048
- Points
- 123
I think this is my single biggest issue with what they did to him- they picked up his option only b/c they planned to trade him, effectively denying him a shot at FA. He is now entering FA not only a year older but coming off a second season of injuries. Had he hit the market this past offseason, he stood to make more than 16m in a multiyear deal, even if it was a prove it deal. Now he will probably be looking at a incentive laden 1 year deal. And all for a reliever who can't pitch without pharmaceutical enhancement and a 4th OFer (no matter how much we like him). Just not how you treat a guy who was arguably the team's best pitcher since Addie Joss, left all his belongings here, and played here on an insanely team friendly deal. It sends a message to the players that this team is purely a business, a sentiment that Clevinger voiced on the way out. That's fine, but once the best player liason this team has in Francona retires here soon we will see how many non-vulnerable players 'buy in' on this team's long-term contract offers. To me, the human thing to do would have been to decline his option and let the guy who gave this club a HOF-caliber 5 year run or whatever his chance to pick his team. But oh well, water under the bridge. At least we got Deshields, who may not be a world beater but looks like an excellent 4th OFer.
You have an issue with the organization doing what was in its best interest? I guarantee every other team in the league would've traded him under the same circumstances rather than cutting him loose for nothing
Let's not forget that the Indians gave Kluber the largest guarantee ever for a pre-arbitration pitcher. Pretty good money for a 29 year pitcher that was what, 4 seasons away from free agency?