SixPACK
All-Star
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2009
- Messages
- 6,607
- Reaction score
- 6,021
- Points
- 113
From that draft (if it played out like that and the players were available at that slot)
1- Garrett
9- McKinley/Cook (sucks ADAMS/Fournette was not around)
33- I am fine with Jones there. May not be a popular pick here, but I wouldn't mind Watson. His potential with a year or 2 of developing could be nice. But I would not throw away this pick for Watson if something great was here. As I have said I am fine with running out RG3/Kessler for another year.
45- Elflein/Baker/Wormley.
The BEST part about this article:
1- Garrett
9- McKinley/Cook (sucks ADAMS/Fournette was not around)
33- I am fine with Jones there. May not be a popular pick here, but I wouldn't mind Watson. His potential with a year or 2 of developing could be nice. But I would not throw away this pick for Watson if something great was here. As I have said I am fine with running out RG3/Kessler for another year.
45- Elflein/Baker/Wormley.
The BEST part about this article:
—"You're going to draft a safety with a lucky interception in the top 10? We get fired for mistakes like that." That's what a director of college scouting texted me this week about Michigan's Jabrill Peppers. As much as the media likes Peppers, the sense I get from NFL folks is the Heisman candidate is more hype than substance.