Sir'Dom Pointer
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2016
- Messages
- 21,636
- Reaction score
- 31,675
- Points
- 148
Yeah the only thinking is if we get him on a cheap deal. Where Nance stands right now, we would be paying him on potential.
I think Nance is a nice player regardless of whether he reaches his potential or not. Depends how much the team values his role and production on what I believe should be a rebuilding team. He currently doesn't have a real position as a Starter..
If he doesn't grow as a player, he quickly falls into the same category alot of PFs who have washed out of the league have. Without a 3 point shot and the durability to play center full time, he becomes hard to play and pay.
I disagree here. I don't believe Nance is the kind of player that wille ever wash out of the league. He impact the game even when he doesn't put up big stats. HE will always have role that he can excel at off the bench if he doesn't reach his full potential.
Unless we are paying him like a 4th big in our rotation, I would hold off on an extension. Especially with Love's extension, how can we say Nance is our starting PF of the future if Love is locked up for 5 years.
the Love extension kinda complicated things. It's a big extension.
That's true about being a starter...if Love is locked up for so long, Nance to me looks like a bench player for the foreseeable future unless they think of him as a starting Center, which I gotta say that I don't like.
By the time Love is off the team, Nance will have "lost" one of his biggest assets, his athleticism.
I don't understand the logic here and what we are trying to do.
Anyways, the risk factors are that a team might decide to overpay for Nance just to fuck with us because they know we will match or some shit like that.