I don’t mind Philly being a winning team. Really anyone besides Boston and Miami in the east is okay with me lol.A Fab-Four could be formidable.
Lakers traded for Reggie Bullock. Pretty good move for them. Gets LeBron a great spot-up shooter without giving anything away.
If the Raptors could get Davis, that is a team on the level with GS perhaps with a few more pieces.I wonder if the Sixers trade motivates the Raptors to go for Anthony Davis. They have some assets and assuming they don’t give up too much I think if they can integrate him they would have a legit shot at the championship
It would be a risk but they are already taking one with Kawhi Leonard so why not go all the way
If the Raptors could get Davis, that is a team on the level with GS perhaps with a few more pieces.
He's a mid-2nd round pick with shooting splits of 33/32/60. He's got a 45.1 TS%. That's worse than Lonzo Ball. He can't crack the Lakers rotation. Could he become a decent player in a few years? Sure. But I doubt it. He could become a Joe Harris in time, but he could just as easily be a guy who never becomes anything more than an end of the bench guy. If you're a team that lacks shooting, getting a solid starter who is a career 40% 3 point shooter for essentially two second round picks is a great move. The Blazers gave up more for Rodney Hood.They gave up Svi and a 2nd round pick. Svi looks like a good prospect and needed time to adjust to the NBA. He was a 40.2%, 39.8%, and 44.4% 3 point shooter in his last 3 years of college.
This is a LeBron win now move if I've ever seen one. Svi could be Joe Harris in a year. Reggie Bollock is an expiring and could very well be with another team next year if he plays well with the Lakers. If he gets offered more than the MLE, the Lakers aren't match that offer. Depending on who they get in free agency, they might ask him to take a discount to keep him.
He's a mid-2nd round pick with shooting splits of 33/32/60. He's got a 45.1 TS%. That's worse than Lonzo Ball. He can't crack the Lakers rotation. Could he become a decent player in a few years? Sure. But I doubt it. He could become a Joe Harris in time, but he could just as easily be a guy who never becomes anything more than an end of the bench guy. If you're a team that lacks shooting, getting a solid starter who is a career 40% 3 point shooter for essentially two second round picks is a great move. The Blazers gave up more for Rodney Hood.
College shooting stats don't always translate to the NBA. Jimmer Fredette was a 39% shooter from 3 in college and he plays in China. If Svi becomes a solid rotation player it won't be for years.Don't let this years shooting percentages mislead you, Svi is a pure shooter who is adjusting to the NBA game and LA pressure. I think at worst, he will be a very solid rotation guy and Joe Harris is a good example of what he might become.
He's a mid-2nd round pick with shooting splits of 33/32/60. He's got a 45.1 TS%. That's worse than Lonzo Ball. He can't crack the Lakers rotation. Could he become a decent player in a few years? Sure. But I doubt it. He could become a Joe Harris in time, but he could just as easily be a guy who never becomes anything more than an end of the bench guy. If you're a team that lacks shooting, getting a solid starter who is a career 40% 3 point shooter for essentially two second round picks is a great move. The Blazers gave up more for Rodney Hood.