Jack Brickman
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2012
- Messages
- 38,456
- Reaction score
- 61,544
- Points
- 148
do want witcher 3.
do not want my PC to melt
I look forward to seeing the Recommended Settings just say "Buy a new PC."
do want witcher 3.
do not want my PC to melt
That sounds like a GPU issue, not CPU. There is just no way to account for a 20 FPS difference between those two processors considering BF3. The most likely difference was that one of you had MSAA turned on and the other had it turned off as that would account for such a discrepancy given the graphics cards you listed.
Also note that BF3 is optimized for the Intel i5-2600k (which is a great processor), but on a GeForce 580, you will get roughly ~80 FPS no matter what CPU you use. BF3 simply is NOT CPU bound. Only with multiplayer is the CPU an issue, and quad core or better configurations will all fair just fine.
Also, procedural asset generation (something I know quite a bit about) is almost always done on-demand and using a dynamic LOD (level of detail). It's not something that you would notice frame-to-frame as that would be VERY poorly optimized code. The assets should be generated and distinct points in the given timeline and this is assuredly offloaded to a particular thread on the CPU with a progressive return value (again, LOD). There's almost no chance that BF3 would cause such an issue with respect to your CPUs.
The graphics card and settings or another issue (perhaps different Catalyst drivers) was certainly the cause. BF3 is simply not CPU bound.
Ehh.. If you have a limited budget of $1,000, and you know your only goal is to use this machine for gaming, the money spent on an Intel processor could be put into a better graphics card. Same goes for Nvidia GPUs; they drive up the cost of the potential motherboard to support SLI. A complete AMD solution CPU/GPU is fine, and in a dual-GPU configuration could give you substantially more performance while staying under budget.
Now, if budget isn't an issue at all, surely Intel is the choice processor, SLI is likely more performant (slightly), and Nvidia cards will do fine (for now). But we're not really talking about building the ultimate gaming rig are we? We talking about building one under $1,000. My money would be on AMD.
I did quite a bit of testing as to why my FPS was different then the nearly identical PC, even switching the cards to the other PC etc. Had a few diagnostic programs running on both PC's, and while his CPU was only running at 50-70% on all 4 cores load at most during stressful times, mine was running at 80-100%. So either it was bad drivers, or the CPU was bottlenecking it. Researched a couple articles off of tomshardware and it all pointed to my CPU being the bottleneck.
Again, I'm a different gamer in that I play a lot of old games, which AMD notably doesn't support that well. But AMD hasn't been good to me over the last 3-4 years so I personally would not recommend them.
my graphic cards alone cost 1400 lol. 2x 780ti Superclocked -- Custom water loop was 1000 -- everything else about 1500 -- of course this was all slowly put together in a year and half...
Case: Corsair 900D
Motherboard: ASUS Sabertooth Z77
CPU: Intel Core i7-3770k 3.5 GHz (overclock to 4.5GHz)
RAM: Corsair Dominator Platinum 16GB 1600 (overclocked to 1866)
HD: Western Digital Caviar Black 2TB SATA 6.0GBs
SSD: 256GB Samsung 840 PRO Series
GPU: 2x EVGA GTX 780ti Superclocked
PSU: Corsair AX1200i
Water Cooling: XSPC Photon - d5 Pump - CPU/GPU Waterblock - 2x 480 rad - 1 140 rad
OD: Pioneer BD/DVD/CD Burner
OS: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
Monitor: Yamakasi Catleap 2B Extreme Overclockable
This is the CPU in my PC:
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=4904561&CatId=7339
$169 for an eight core 4GHz unlocked CPU. That's a hell of a deal, and AMD offers even cheaper options for a budget rig. You're just not going to get that kind of performance on a comparably-priced Intel rig.
Note: I think this CPU was either $200 or $250 around a year ago when I bought it. Still a great value.
My GPU is the nVidia GeForce GTX 680 4GB edition, which I'll probably be upgrading sometime in the next year. Probably when the third Witcher game comes out. Not sure my current rig can handle that beast on the highest settings. :chuckles:
For the best budget rig, go AMD for CPU and nVidia for CPU imo.
This processor looks nasty and I'm baffled at the low price. 8 cores and that speed under 200$? Somebody tell me what the catch is. Compatibility? Cooling?
This processor looks nasty and I'm baffled at the low price. 8 cores and that speed under 200$? Somebody tell me what the catch is. Compatibility? Cooling?
That leads to my next stupid question: cooling.
Do I need to purchase a separate cooling system? Liquid cooling seems to be a buzzword everywhere I look. Is liquid cooling reliable? Is it just another 'lego' that gets plugged in? Do cases normally come with cooling systems already installed?