This is beyond ridiculousness Waiters outperformed Singler in almost every statistical category offensively , defensively and on/off, even at the three where Dion is 4 inches shorter.
You sure about that?
For all of last season, Singler shot better from 3pt (39% to 29%) than Dion. He had a higher eFG% (49%/45%), was better from the line (77% to 68%), and consequently had a higher TS% (51% to 46%). He also had a higher Treb% (6.0/4.8).
Singler also had a better WS/48 (.56 to .25) He was nine points better in ORtg (104-95), and only one point lower defensively (108-109). Neither was any great shakes in terms of box score =/- per 100 possessions, but Singler was better there was as well: -1.6 v. -3.6 for Dion. And finally, value over replacement player, Singler was 0.2, and Dion was -0.9.
http://www.basketball-reference.com...tedi01&y2=2015&p3=&p4=&p5=&p6=#advanced::none
And even if you just limit it to the 26 games Singler was with OKC, and compare that to Dion's time at OKC, he still shot significantly better from 3 (37%-31%), and was better in BPM (-2.6 to -3.8) VORP(-0.1 to -0.7), and WS/48 (.041 to .023)
One of the big issues is that while neither of them is very good, Singler's USG% was 11.0, while Dion's was 21.7. If you're not very good, your team is generally going to be better off if you're not chucking so much.
And btw, if you look at their entire careers, the difference pretty much remains. Singler's career BPM is -1.2, while Dion's is -3.0. Singler's career VORP is +1.4, and Dion's is -1.5.
If someone wanted to quibble about which of those two scrubs is worse, I suppose you could make an argument either way. But saying that it is "beyond ridiculous" to prefer Singler over Dion is itself ridiculous. I frankly agree with that simply because Singler knows he's just a role player, and plays that way. Dion thinks he's a star, tries to play like one, and can't. As a result, you get ridiculously high usage from someone who just isn't that good.