I disagree with this, too. In a make or miss league, and when the playoffs slow down to a half-court grind, you can NEVER have enough shooters. Especially when one of those shooters is in the conversation for best shooter in the league.
Furthermore, there's no guarantee that JR will return to form, and given how CRUCIAL JR is to our team's makeup, Korver provides a partial insurance plan.
And finally, you can ONLY say this doesn't fill a need because you do not yet know the FINAL makeup of our roster. It could very well be that AFTER Griffin makes all of his moves, that Korver's role and necessity for this team will be more clearly defined.
So, like I said, you CANNOT judge this trade until after the trade deadline is finished.
EDIT: Also, another possibility: getting Korver could have been a defensive move. In that, it was between us and Spurs/Warriors trading for him, so we got him to keep our competition from getting better. Don't assume you have all of the facts to correctly judge this trade.
That's a good point
I like the korver pick up
I just don't think this can be THE move I think korver can be a good step to building an outstanding bench