How could the Cavs possibly feel bad about trading Jamison? Maybe I'll have to read between the lines....
So two months ago the front office actually thought this team had a chance of making the 8th seed. Now they realize they have the same team as last year plus one great rookie and one project rookie. Other than that, seems like trading Jamison wouldn't require much thought.
Because despite Dan Gilbert's willingness to spend, this is not monopoly money?
Was that a serious question?
Just a little tidbit on trade rumors surrounding the cavs, not too much to say though.
http://www.hoopsrumors.com/2012/03/...tml?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
Just a little tidbit on trade rumors surrounding the cavs, not too much to say though.
http://www.hoopsrumors.com/2012/03/...tml?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
So on one hand, you think he is overrated, but on the other hand you don't know why they would part with him for Sessions bc they have Devin Harris...who sucks royal cock? Pick a side. And yes, Harris has been awful this year.Favors was and is severely overrated. With that said he's better than every big we have.
But why in the fuck would they trade him for Sessions, especially considering they already have Devin Harris? This has to be a joke.
Derrick Favors, the third overall pick in 2010, is on the trade block, according to The Bullshit Whisperer. The Jazz would like to acquire a point guard or small forward.
Sessions, Casspi, I would even throw in next years 2nd round pick just to sweeten up the offer a bit... We would have a great young core if we got Favors, and a young guy in the draft. Young core ---> Kyrie, Tristan, Gee, Favors, draft (Beal or Lamb?)