Snowblind
It's Business Time
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2008
- Messages
- 3,965
- Reaction score
- 2,791
- Points
- 113
He would have been better than Colt, thats for sure. Aaron Rodgers has a great arm, scarmbling ability, and can read defenses better than most quarterbacks in the league. What does Colt do well? Do you honestly believe that if it had been Colt behind Favre, the Packers would still be as successful as they have been? Put Colt on the Packers and they don't sniff the playoffs.
Yeah, but Rogers had a couple seasons to watch tape, develop and build some chemistry with the team, having the same system also helps. That's all without even playing since he had to sit behind Favre. Rogers also has a way better receiving core than the Browns have ever had.
I have no idea if Colt has a future here, but comparing him to Rogers and GB in anyway isn't a fair comparison.