Cavatt
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2008
- Messages
- 29,261
- Reaction score
- 38,444
- Points
- 148
I still think we take Garland over Hunter if say, Culver went 4th. I just got such strong Garland stuff all week before the draft as soon as that workout happened it seemed like he was going to be the guy.
I meant Hunter would have been the guy to add "length and defense" around Sexton like the article suggested should have been done.
It's a little hard for me to believe that Beilein would be as into Hunter as he was into Garland. Even Koby seems to be into the sexy choice over the sensible one.
I also think choosing Garland over Culver must have meant they really just thought Garland was the much better player. They are not looking for defense yet, they are looking for a transcendent scoring talent.