Someone said about Lauri, the idea of what Lauri could be is romanticized and better than what he actually is. The idea of him is an absolute all-star if it came together.
I feel similar sentiments about Caris; he's good, but underwhelming most times, and you have to assume 50% availability rate. The idea of Caris is better than he actually is. Career Avg 33% from 3, needs the ball and drains the posession. There are going to be a LOT of clanks off the rim. Like a more inefficient Kobe-lite.
Collin, OTOH, on offense, is better than your idea of him. You think of him as an inefficient westbrook type ball hog, but he's actually remarkably efficient and doesn't waste time with the ball in his hands.
I get the specimen characteristics than Caris possesses, good height and length, plus avg D, and decent ball handling, but does it really make us better over a long stretch? It's a close call imo.