- Joined
- Jul 12, 2014
- Messages
- 26,916
- Reaction score
- 56,553
- Points
- 151
The two teams sitting atop the West don't have a franchise player.
The team in 3rd drafted theirs in the 2nd round.
I mean hell, even the Clippers. Kawhi wasn't a lottery pick. Paul George was picked 10th.
There are other ways and there are examples all over the league atm.
What you are describing is atypical.
What are the odds of replicating Utah and Denver's success?
How many late picks have to work out to be very good players? What type of coaching does that require? What type of organization must one have to have years of patience in developing that team?
What are the chances of finding another late pick like Leonard? How often does that happen? What type of team not only identifies that talent late in the Draft, but has the patience to develop him?
Building teams in this fashion takes years and years and is also the hardest route to success. What leads one to believe this is replicable in Cleveland?
How or why is this preferable to simply landing a Top Five pick in a loaded Draft?
It is a lot to justify what amounts to as impatience, no?
Would you say that the longterm success of Colin Sexton and Darius Garland are best served by putting a franchise player next to them rather than winning a few extra games at the end of a lost season?
And I want to emphasize this is a lost season. It isn't as if the Cavs went into the season telling the kids to lose. They had their shot, yes they had many injuries, but they got plenty of development. They have holes that need to be filled.