FAKE NEWS! (because apparently we start our posts here with childish screaming)
So Lindor will come in a around 20-22 million next year. Each of the last 2 seasons the indians have paid a player 18+ million, and depending how how signing bonuses were spread 20 million could have been reached. So yes the indians have paid a player within the same pay range before (in fact each of the last 2 seasons). So the argument that the indians "dont pay that kind of money" is absolute and totally incorrect.
Furthermore the indians have already massively cut back their total salary from last year, reducing their projected payroll down to 55 million and thats WITH Lindor projected to make 21.5. So while yes we have absolutely no idea how bad the Indians did and are projected to hemorrhage money going forward and we all absolutely assume that the indians are very probable to trade Lindor. My guess is the indians FO has at least an idea of how to keep Lindor for 1 more season if no bidders arise.
Great job bob2the2nd !!!!
Emphasis has now become screaming on this board - love the rules by which comments are prejudiced. And I am neither childish or screaming if you haven't figured that out yet.
Silly of me to think I had dealt with that last offseason when everyone was going on about how I was a shill for that "unmentionable name".
On the baseball front, you could be right that some salaries have approached $18 million. But if you actually look at their history, they trade top players at right around $17-$18 million in recent times (Kluber, Bauer). Or dump the contract if they approach $20 million (Santana and Encarnation). So say what you want about Lindor, because no one really knows what his salary will be at the moment. But $21 plus is a very likely number.
Now those contracts were all "
in good times" (notice I didn't capitalize it ?? - just because I wouldn't want to be thought of as a 2 yr old throwing a tantrum) ie full fans, divisional championships and playoff runs. So go ahead and tell me a COVID impacted season with another one the horizon doesn't change that bar since my childish mind can't comprehend business world facts.
And lastly, if you are the Indians, sitting here wondering how long next season will be, and what a trade deadline deal might look like, for a rental (could be very short term) short stop (that has the real possibility of being light hitting next year) with free agency for so many "markee" short stops right around the corner, and weigh that against the $21++ you could possibly get stuck with, with no prospect return. Then compare that with a deal this off season.
The Indians FO isn't stupid and doesn't gamble much. Weigh the possibilities of the two for yourself and then come scream at me for being childish.
PS Bob - will be interesting to see which side posters fall on, the side of me back bitting your comments or the side of your attack. Because last year there was plenty of admonishment for this kind of stuff and much of it came my way - deservedly or not