- Joined
- Aug 20, 2005
- Messages
- 36,809
- Reaction score
- 94,114
- Points
- 148
The Athletic had a great article about how Shanahan shares your exact same thoughts on the defensive line. Having a line that can prevent your opponent from being able to control the pace of the game makes it easy for an offense to call plays. Having a good offensive line is required to control pace. You need both.
Kawakami: Another defensive lineman? Kyle Shanahan’s 49ers are committed to this
Shanahan: "Nothing's more fun (than) having a defense like we had last year; that gives you the best chance to go to the Super Bowl."theathletic.com
Not only do I agree with the philosophy from the Niners, as I've watched the Lynch/Shanny pairing build a very strong team, but I see the Browns are already in lock step with that philosophy. Obviously Shanahan knows the value of generating pass rush with the front four and controlling the line of scrimmage because he is a skilled play designer. He knows what is the hardest to mitigate. I also agree with what @Out of the Rafters at the Q said about the strength of both lines being the quality of it's weakest link. It goes right along with what the two franchises have invested in.
However, the Browns don't necessarily have to draft defensive linemen in this draft to uphold that philosophy. They signed Clayborn to cut down on Garrett and Vernon reps and keep them fresher. This isn't a good draft for 4-3 defensive ends anyways. They brought in Billings to cut into Larry O's snap count while Richardson is making big bucks to be a three tech. The way they can afford these veterans is by getting younger and more cost controlled at safety and linebacker.
So if they go with a three tech at some point, great. I still know Joe Woods was a passing game coordinator, and the way he greatly improved the Niners defense was at the second level, further developing Fred Warner, Dre Greenlaw, and paying for Kwon Alexander in free agency. So, invest in the lines, but use picks to compliment the lines as well.