I'mWithDan
"Straight Cash Homie"
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2010
- Messages
- 11,838
- Reaction score
- 23,881
- Points
- 135
There aren't many good quantitative ways to measure athleticism...even combine data isn't great except for extreme outliers. Dunks per field goal attempt seems like a reasonable data point to me. I don't expect him to dunk the ball every possession, but at his size, it's strange to go 3 months and 200+ field goal attempts without a dunk.
He hasn't dunked in 200+ FG attempts? I don't feel like rewatching all his film but he has dunked several times in the 5-6 games I have watched.
I'm kind of curious if there is correlation between on ball usage and dunks. I suspect with bigger players, it actually has a negative effect. That is why I'm not sure how indicative it is of athleticism. Again, that is more of just my gut feel watching his tape and seeing how few dunk opportunities he has, relative to how defenses sag and rotate against OSU.
I think my biggest takeaway from 5-6 games of film with Cade, if I were his coach, I would say "Cade, you are being given zero space to drive, relative to defensive help, I want you to shoot more 3's. If you have a good look, it needs to go up."
Cade's 3PT volume should be far higher than it is......relative to his skill as a shooter and the way he is being defended. His coaches could help him, by using him off ball better......but he also needs to just start taking self created 3's even more. I think his split was around 50/50 last time I looked......if he's going to be dominating possession of the ball, that needs to be more like 70/30 on increased volume.
I'm not making the case to take him #1 at this point......but I just think qualitatively, there are a lot of explanations for why people have found him to be a little flat (relative to his hype), that can be remedied with better deployment of him as a player and the expectation that he can improve on his weaknesses.