No he’s fine too. I do wish he was more physical on defense though. Guys know if they put their weight into him they’ll win the exchange. I tried to tell you Claxton was better.Except for Jarrett Allen, right?
Last edited:
No he’s fine too. I do wish he was more physical on defense though. Guys know if they put their weight into him they’ll win the exchange. I tried to tell you Claxton was better.Except for Jarrett Allen, right?
You watched that game last night and thought Allen was the better center? Maybe I’m just blind.I am not going to bring up Allen anymore other than in game threads. I concedeExcept that he's not. There's literally nothing that Claxton does better than Jarrett. Not a thing.
You watched that game last night and thought Allen was the better center? Maybe I’m just blind.I am not going to bring up Allen anymore other than in game threads. I concede
Claxton leads the nba in fg percentage averages the same amount of rebounds, a block more, two points less and to me plays with more energy, toughness, heart.Except that he's not. There's literally nothing that Claxton does better than Jarrett. Not a thing.
Allen was the better center, Claxton gave up open 3 after open 3 and would have been benched in a playoff seriesYou watched that game last night and thought Allen was the better center? Maybe I’m just blind.I am not going to bring up Allen anymore other than in game threads. I concede
Claxton leads the nba in fg percentage averages the same amount of rebounds, a block more, two points less and to me plays with more energy, toughness, heart.
You realize this website has Mobley ranked as the 103rd best defender, right? Worse than Isaiah Hartenstein and Nick Batum?Claxton is a better defender, Allen is a better offensive player. When it comes time for Claxton to get paid, it'll be in the 15 Mil per range I'd say. Allen could very score more buckets but he has 2 lightning guards and an unicorn big next to him.
View attachment 14679
Yes. But I also did some research on analytical sites to use as tools and this one came in at #2. There are things to take with grains of salt, Mobley being deeply underrated on this site is one of them. And I'm still trying to dig in on why they value Mobley the way they do. They are discrediting him somewhere drastically. Maybe it's the +/-, 3pt%+ft% shooting, turnovers.You realize this website has Mobley ranked as the 103rd best defender, right? Worse than Isaiah Hartenstein and Nick Batum?
its +/-. His +/- numbers have been whack all year. Especially with the insane 3pt luck when he is on the floorYes. But I also did some research on analytical sites to use as tools and this one came in at #2. There are things to take with grains of salt, Mobley being deeply underrated on this site is one of them. And I'm still trying to dig in on why they value Mobley the way they do. They are discrediting him somewhere drastically. Maybe it's the +/-, 3pt%+ft% shooting, turnovers.
Which analytical site came in #1?Yes. But I also did some research on analytical sites to use as tools and this one came in at #2. There are things to take with grains of salt, Mobley being deeply underrated on this site is one of them. And I'm still trying to dig in on why they value Mobley the way they do. They are discrediting him somewhere drastically. Maybe it's the +/-, 3pt%+ft% shooting, turnovers.