Bob_The_Cat
Gold Star Member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2010
- Messages
- 11,032
- Reaction score
- 17,053
- Points
- 123
For me, I would think the roller derby would want the judge to rule that the two names can co-exist due to no confusion in use. Why?
Two main revenue sources that they do have
1) .com name which should be worth more than the 4 figures the Indians offered
2) As they have used the name before and thus have some rights to continue to use it fir their branding, they should hire a branding agent and graphic artist to design tshirts of what non-flash fans wanted the new logo to be (statues). Get a stand downtown pre-game (to market their sport/use) and look at the money they can make if they avoid using the same font and silly G-baseball trademarks. If something catches on, sell their trademark design to the Indians.
This was my first thought. Roller Derby team could maintain use of name but license the use of name to Baseball Team for certain use cases. Charge baseball team an annual fee plus a percentage of profits from merchandise and other items bearing the name. This is exactly what teams and universities do when it comes to licensing the use of brand assets to other companies.
Baseball team can either agree or decide to undergo a lawsuit they will likely lose where private communications within the team will have to be reviewed and made public, or potentially have to go through the re-branding process all over again.