it was touch and go. Still is. Thank you
-
Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.
Ex Indians update
- Thread starter DCTribefan
- Start date
Mudcat Grant was never sorry
Baseball expected its Black stars to shut up and play. Then, one night in Cleveland, a pitcher came out singing — and swinging.
By
Kevin B. Blackistone
Columnist
Today at 9:00 a.m. EDT
Though it was a room-temperature evening in Cleveland Stadium on Sept. 16, 1960, with a gentle breeze blowing off Lake Erie, Cleveland pitcher Jim “Mudcat” Grant was hot. Red hot. Angry hot.
It was the kind of hot that had forged him growing up north of Tampa, in little, mostly Black Lacoochee, Fla. — in a shack with no hot water, no electricity, no indoor bathroom — with his mother, Viola, rearing her seven children on whatever she could earn cleaning White people’s homes and canning fruit at a nearby citrus plant, after the father of the family died of pneumonia working in a lumber mill.
Yeah, that kind of hot. The kind Grant steeped in as a baseball star who still had to suffer the indignities of Jim Crow America — such as picking up his and other Black players’ luggage from the hotels where the White players (and only the White players) stayed. The kind that, just a week earlier, was reheated when a presidential candidate, John F. Kennedy, knocked on Grant’s door requesting a meeting to talk about what it was like to be a Black player in a sport that for so long didn’t want any.
Grant told Kennedy what it was like, all right. He told him about hearing his so-called teammates spit racist insults at Black fans who came to watch him play in his native Florida, a state that was also no stranger to lynching Blacks. About having to take directions from his pitching coach, Ted Wilks, who was reputed to throw regularly at the heads of Black batters, and who, in 1947, as a pitcher with the St. Louis Cardinals, had tried to organize a boycott against the Brooklyn Dodgers to avoid playing against race-barrier-breaking Jackie Robinson.
So that day in Cleveland in 1960, as Black college students risked their well-being by sitting at Whites-only lunch counters, Grant boiled over. As “The Star-Spangled Banner” reached its concluding crescendo — “O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave” — Grant, in the bullpen, freestyled:
“This land is not free,” he sang, according to the Black-owned Philadelphia Tribune. “I can’t even go to Mis-sah-sip-pee …”
For most of the first half of the previous century, Black athletes subjugated themselves to emasculation. They performed. Then they behaved as was expected of Black Americans in post-reconstruction, pre-civil-rights-era America. Joe Louis, Jesse Owens, even Robinson: They were celebrated by White America as standard-bearers for Black America in the country’s pursuit of racial peace and unity, but they were celebrated in separateness.
During that rendition of the anthem, though, Grant — who was too ill to talk when I called his Los Angeles home this summer and died at 85 as this story was in production — refused to be another Black athlete who turned a cheek. Instead, he followed high jumper Rose Robinson, who years earlier refused to honor the national anthem, in evicting the accommodationist Black athlete and making room for something different: the confrontationist Black athlete.
Grant was a progenitor of the revolutionary Black athlete who fully expressed how he felt. And he did so in the most reactionary of sports, baseball, a game anointed America’s pastime despite doing as much to propagate racial injustice in this country as any corner of society. Then, of course, like now, much of White America wanted nothing more from Black athletes than to entertain it and shut up.
“If you don’t like our country,” Wilks demanded of Grant in the bullpen, according to the Associated Press report, “then why the hell don’t you get out?”
“What’s it to you?” Grant fired back, the Black-owned Afro-American reported. “If I wanted to leave the country, all I’d have to do is go to Texas, which is worse than Russia.”
“If we catch your n----- a-- in Texas,” Wilks reportedly spat, “we’re going to hang you from the nearest tree.”
Grant, a 6-foot-1, 186-pound all-around athlete, threw a punch that put Wilks on the ground. Other players saved the coach from further punishment. Grant grabbed his things and left.
The White press noted Grant’s audacity with headlines like the Chicago Daily Tribune’s on Sept. 17, 1960 — “Mudcat Grant is Sorry Man” — and quoted Grant’s Black stablemate Don Newcombe apologizing for his protest and eruption. “I tried to talk Grant out of going home, but he said he was leaving,” Newcombe was quoted by United Press International. “There’s enough trouble around the world without getting steamed over a little incident like this.”
But the Black press celebrated Grant’s refusal to just wipe more racist spittle from his face. “Don, like Roy Campanella, and unlike Jackie Robinson,” wrote L. I. Brockenbury in the Los Angeles Sentinel, “feels that a Negro should feel so honored to be with a white team that he should take just about anything.”
Cleveland Manager Jimmy Dykes suspended Grant for walking out on the team without informing him. Grant, though, was largely unrepentant.
“I’m going to stand up for what I believe in,” he said. “I’m tired of being called names. In Baltimore, [Orioles Manager] Paul Richards called me a name. I’m not going to take it anymore.
“If Newcombe wants to accept Wilks’s apology,” Grant continued, “that’s up to him. I’m not accepting it.”
Grant was part of the second trickle of Black major leaguers after Robinson joined the Dodgers in 1947.
“You were always aware that you were Black because there were stares,” Grant wrote years later in his book, “The Black Aces: Baseball’s Only African-American Twenty-Game Winners.” “People that took your money at the counter that didn’t want to touch your hand. People when you sat next to them on the airplane who sat sideways, away from you.”
It is notable that his mentor in Cleveland was the first Black player in the American League, Larry Doby, who followed Robinson’s debut by three months — and who, in 1957, punched out White pitcher Art Ditmar, which the press noted was the first time a Black player fought a White player. Washington Post sports columnist Shirley Povich called it an emancipatory moment for Black athletes.
After punching out his pitching coach, Grant never stopped girding the bridge he helped build from accommodationist Black athlete to activist. Upon being traded to Minnesota, he called out Twins owner Calvin Griffith, who moved the club there from Washington to get closer to “good-working White people,” for treating Black players as less. Grant then chose Black catcher Earl Battey as his battery mate, in part to demonstrate that a Black player could excel at a position that baseball has long thought too important for them. The pairing won 21 games for the Twins in 1965.
Grant’s activism had impact, too: His meeting with Kennedy eventually resulted in the president funneling federal aid to Grant’s hometown, providing it with running water for the first time.
“Mudcat is always ahead of things,” Frank Deford wrote in Sports Illustrated in the April 8, 1968, issue, published four days after Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated. “Of course, this can be very tricky if you are a Negro. You might get your head blown off being ahead of your time.”
Or as Grant himself put it: “I was in the NAACP before it was Camp.”
On the field, Grant wound up with a 14-year career. He won 145 games and saved 54. His best seasons were in Minnesota, where he helped lead the Twins to the 1965 World Series while becoming the AL’s first Black pitcher to win 20 games. Then, in retirement, Grant wrote his book to celebrate the Black pitchers who reached that same rung.
“He’s an extension of the Negro Leagues,” said Bob Kendrick, the president of the Negro Leagues Baseball Museum. “When he wrote that book, he thought about the pitchers in the Negro Leagues who would’ve been 20-game winners had they been given a chance. That legacy meant something to him. He understood his place in this game.”
And he understood, no doubt, the lineage of equally successful — and similarly confrontational — Black athletes who followed: Muhammad Ali, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, John Carlos and Tommie Smith, Craig Hodges, Carlos Delgado, Toni Smith-Thompson, Maya Moore, Colin Kaepernick and more to come.
Updated August 15, 2021
DCTribefan
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2019
- Messages
- 11,621
- Reaction score
- 10,405
- Points
- 123
Trevor Bauer's accuser pressed on social media omissions at restraining order hearing
A San Diego woman seeking a restraining order against Trevor Bauer admitted she had sexual relationships with Padres players Fernando Tatis Jr. and Mike Clevinger.
AZ_
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2007
- Messages
- 40,728
- Reaction score
- 51,465
- Points
- 148
“accuser becomes flustered” isn’t a great headline if your goal is to provide anything remotely resembling credible journalism.
That said, dragging Mike Clevenger and Tatis into your sex assault case and trying to paint her as a clear chaser is a strange move for a guy who ever wants to walk into a major league clubhouse again.
To say nothing of being a shit defense against sexual assault.
This whole story is disgusting, hard to imagine any team buying on Bauer after this.
That said, dragging Mike Clevenger and Tatis into your sex assault case and trying to paint her as a clear chaser is a strange move for a guy who ever wants to walk into a major league clubhouse again.
To say nothing of being a shit defense against sexual assault.
This whole story is disgusting, hard to imagine any team buying on Bauer after this.
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2008
- Messages
- 34,117
- Reaction score
- 64,408
- Points
- 148
The core of his defense is that this was all consensual, and that none of the contemporaneous messaging from her objected to what had happened or claimed he had crossed a line that she didn't want crossed. That's not saying she doesn't regret it, or wishes in retrospect that it hadn't happened, but it is his conduct/motive at the time it happened that is the issue regardless of whether she subsequently had regrets. Bauer's clearly a weird dude, but based on what I read in that article, I think her case is pretty shaky.
All that being said, I don't think a team would be willing right now to pay him what he's currently making, but unless this amounts to cause to terminate his contract, he's still under contract with the Dodgers through 2023, and I think they'll probably keep playing him.
There are two legal questions going on here...one is the immediate case in re the restraining order....the other a possible criminal case.
The problem for Bauers attorneys is that the two require different defenses that in some ways are counter productive. The most grievous is the fact that they are readily admitting that Bauer actually did the things that are alleged. Their defense that she agreed to be mishandled may work in re the restraining order, but in a criminal case it is an admission of guilt, because the law is explicit in that consent can not be given to extreme bodily injury.
But in re Bauers future career, there is a far different measuring stick. He doesn't have to be found guilty of a crime to be suspended or even banned. He has already admitted to enough violence towards a woman to put both suspension and banishment into play. And if the accusations in Ohio have any kind of proof, esp emails from Bauer that have been alleged, there will be an established pattern.
The 'I beat women up, because they ask for it' won't hold up with the public, even if they did ask for it.
I think it is doubtful that Bauer ever plays another game for the Dodgers, although he may get payed a lot of money to sit. And backing from the MLBPA is iffy, if he files a grievance. In the midst of negotiations leading to a possible work stoppage, the players generally have a lack of public support. Backing what the public views as a serious predator would make things worse.
I kinda doubt that there are many players who support Bauer that will be willing to back him when doing so might have an negative effect on their future earnings.
MLB will be almost unanimously applauded, if it bans Bauer. Anything less than the longest suspension in baseball history will bring down a tsunami of wrath, and give baseball a permanent black eye.
In a way MLB may benefit from Bauers case, because it could make an example of him in order to show that baseball is truly in line with new societal norms in opinion.
While there is a lot of public sympathy for Shoeless Joe (MLB just celebrated a movie about him, and plan to do so every year) and Pete Rose, there would be no sympathy for a banned Trevor Bauer.
100 years after the fact, Joe Jackson is a hero and legend to nearly all of baseball loving fans. Pete Rose somewhat the same. Trevor Bauer will always be a villain....no matter the legal results.
The problem for Bauers attorneys is that the two require different defenses that in some ways are counter productive. The most grievous is the fact that they are readily admitting that Bauer actually did the things that are alleged. Their defense that she agreed to be mishandled may work in re the restraining order, but in a criminal case it is an admission of guilt, because the law is explicit in that consent can not be given to extreme bodily injury.
But in re Bauers future career, there is a far different measuring stick. He doesn't have to be found guilty of a crime to be suspended or even banned. He has already admitted to enough violence towards a woman to put both suspension and banishment into play. And if the accusations in Ohio have any kind of proof, esp emails from Bauer that have been alleged, there will be an established pattern.
The 'I beat women up, because they ask for it' won't hold up with the public, even if they did ask for it.
I think it is doubtful that Bauer ever plays another game for the Dodgers, although he may get payed a lot of money to sit. And backing from the MLBPA is iffy, if he files a grievance. In the midst of negotiations leading to a possible work stoppage, the players generally have a lack of public support. Backing what the public views as a serious predator would make things worse.
I kinda doubt that there are many players who support Bauer that will be willing to back him when doing so might have an negative effect on their future earnings.
MLB will be almost unanimously applauded, if it bans Bauer. Anything less than the longest suspension in baseball history will bring down a tsunami of wrath, and give baseball a permanent black eye.
In a way MLB may benefit from Bauers case, because it could make an example of him in order to show that baseball is truly in line with new societal norms in opinion.
While there is a lot of public sympathy for Shoeless Joe (MLB just celebrated a movie about him, and plan to do so every year) and Pete Rose, there would be no sympathy for a banned Trevor Bauer.
100 years after the fact, Joe Jackson is a hero and legend to nearly all of baseball loving fans. Pete Rose somewhat the same. Trevor Bauer will always be a villain....no matter the legal results.
33Y0
Jobu Needs A Refill
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2020
- Messages
- 3,456
- Reaction score
- 6,002
- Points
- 113
I'm not sure I'd compare Pete Rose and Trevor Bauer.... Pete Rose bet on baseball, but he didn't beat the shit out of a woman. I think betting on baseball is a hell of a lot more forgiving than beating a woman. Just my two cents.
Totally agree, and that is the point.
Nobody in baseball and baseball Fandom is gonna forgive Bauer for what he has admitted to doing.
Derek
Table Setter
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2009
- Messages
- 18,221
- Reaction score
- 31,606
- Points
- 148
He hasn’t admitted to anything unforgivable yet, but if he did anything that wasn’t consensual, he can fuck right off.
33Y0
Jobu Needs A Refill
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2020
- Messages
- 3,456
- Reaction score
- 6,002
- Points
- 113
I don't want to derail this thread with the Bauer stuff as that's gotten this locked in the past, but I'll just leave it at this: I'd be shocked if he pitches again this season. As far as next season is concerned, I wouldn't be surprised if he has a suspension but then returns.
Alabuckeye
Sixth Man
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2020
- Messages
- 1,237
- Reaction score
- 1,685
- Points
- 113
the way MLB is dragging out the 7 day things with him, Yeah, I don't think he's pitching again this year.
Question is....what do the Dodgers do with him in the off season? Assume he has an 80 game suspension next year. What can they do with him?
I guess he's fortunate he went against his repeated claims he was going to only sign 1 year deals.
or will the female fan base