DCTribefan
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2019
- Messages
- 11,621
- Reaction score
- 10,405
- Points
- 123
Think we all know the answer.Wonder how this sets the market for Lindor and the Mets extension talks
Think we all know the answer.Wonder how this sets the market for Lindor and the Mets extension talks
Thank God it is the form that can be treated effectively. There are way too many that are not as fortunate.Glad to hear those who you know with leukemia are managing and doing well. I still think it is an ongoing risk with Cookie no matter how advanced the treatments. That’s my point rather than taking issue with your earlier comments. If you think I misrepresented your comments,I apologize.
If FO thought Gimenez was rushed, why bring him in the deal? Sounds like they want him to start AAA (especially in your lineup chart). We will have Arias, Miller, Freeman, Jones and Gimenez in AAA not to rush them .... Take out Gimenez or Rosario and add in OF/C and it would look better (but Mets didnt have OF and Alverez C and Baty 3B were too young).
And, with that line up card, will it get us close to a WC race this year? If not, why spend $10 million this year, when it can be spent when we really have a shot? I like Cesar but seems redundant unless we can trade him at deadline when out of the race and bringing up Freeman/Miller to take over.
Hard to believe that Chang gets gone because Clement is there. Clement seems like fodder to me.This is how I project the middle infield to look like at Columbus and Akron if Cesar is re-signed:
AAA- Gimenez and Miller
AA- Arias and Freeman
Ernie Clement probably becomes your utility infielder in Cleveland with Chang getting either traded or DFA’d.
$320m is absolutely insane for a guy with 4 more years of team control. So risky
For context, I believe the largest pre-arbitration number is Mike Trout at 6 yrs $144.5m
More recent superstar examples would be Acuna at 8 yrs $100m and Bregman at 6 yrs $100m
Yeah .... no room for Clement after 2022 on 40 and Chang is cut after this year unless he shines too. Clement only got a 40 spot due to the transition to youth and uncertainty. Would have seen a glimpse if we didn’t get Rosario and Gimenez for Lindor. And that spot cost us Oviedo (I had him over Clement).Hard to believe that Chang gets gone because Clement is there. Clement seems like fodder to me.
$320m is absolutely insane for a guy with 4 more years of team control. So risky
For context, I believe the largest pre-arbitration number is Mike Trout at 6 yrs $144.5m
More recent superstar examples would be Acuna at 8 yrs $100m and Bregman at 6 yrs $100m
My primary concern isn't the farm system. It was evident we'd trade Lindor, so we had no MIF. With the trade we now have a playable MIF with upside that clearly exceeds the internal "alternatives". Chang hasn't even performed in the minors, Clement needs at least another year, Freeman and Arias another 2 years, as neither even reached AA yet.You like the trade because you think there might be something in these prospects that nobody else sees or cares about. It's your thing and I appreciate it, but what was added created more depth. It didn't move the needle one way or the other for the value of the farm system.
Gimenez is not an "exciting get". He just isn't. He's a good glove, slap hitting MIFer that was rapidly declining down the prospect charts because he was overrated to begin with. For a team desperate to find some offense, Gimenez isn't the type of hitter you would like to see returned for Lindor and Carrasco. What he might be is a good leadoff man which was a need. We'll see if he can fill those shoes because otherwise he's of very little value.
Rosario would have been a good stopgap until one of our own is ready. However, he appears to be our starting 2B now and I would prefer to see Miller or Chang given the opportunity TBH.
Wolf and Greene are basically the "exciting gets" in this deal and they are a long way off and can't crack our top 10. One of Gimenez or Rosario along with Wolf and Greene would have been an acceptable return for Lindor considering the circumstances, but Carrasco being include changes the entire landscape of this trade.
Like I said before, it's ok to call the trade what it really was and that is a salary dump. There's no harm in it.
Pitchers can ascend to ML value much quicker than hitters, see McKenzie.Mejia last pitched 33 innings in A ball in 2019. I wouldn't count on much, if anything, from him at the major league level in 2021. Maybe later in the season if he does well at AA, but how many innings will he be able to throw this year?
Damn CDAV, you're a fade machine.This has nothing to do with trusting the FO. You act as if this is occurred because they wanted it to. They did what they had to do.
Carlos' "serious health issue" is under control for now and he pitched like he typically does. He's the model of consistency. He's worth much more than the measly $12M he's making this year and next. Unfortunately that $12M is more than the Indians' owner can swing at this time.
Rosario was a 65 FV for FG, who are notoriously conservative with FV grades. That's elite Acuna/Soto territory. And he's performed well outside of a stadium he won't have to play again.
Nice try to slant this into a subjective opinion. This was recent scouts consensus, not some wish casting "nobody else sees or cares about"
I love this move. It would be a solid platoon. As far as the abundance of MIF's.....we could always look to move one for a veteran OF. Both SS's we rec'd in the trade are young and may interest teams that will not be in the market for the more expensive SS's this year & next year....Like the A's maybe if the Rockies move Story or the Cubs move Baez.Joc Pederson makes a ton of sense as a platoon partner with Luplow. If both hit at career norms they'd produce all-star-caliber production together.