You are quoted by saying "Dez's upside is much higher than Gordon's!" and you have no real basis of saying this at all. I'm going by their early year production because, you know, Gordon is BARELY in his second season!
People often misread what is actually said. All that was is said is that Gordon is a top-5 talent, not a top-5 player. You look at Gordon's small body of work, compared to Dez's, early in his career. And you also look at that Gordon is bigger(okay a little bigger, but technically bigger), he's actually faster, and can make the spectacular catches. What exactly makes Dez's upside so much bigger? I just want to know is all.
You're arguing apples and oranges. Dez is better right NOW, but he's more experienced, has played in the NFL longer.
Josh Gordon is 22 years old PEOPLE! Let's stop acting like he doesn't have room for improvement, and is only going to get better himself.
To think he has a lot of work, to become a top caliber receiver in the league is okay. But to seriously deny him his talent is absurd.
There aren't many receivers of his size, strength, and speed that can do the things he's capable of.
If Gordon was traded to the Patriots (which I fear could be a possibility given how desperate they are for receiver talent). People would be vomiting all over themselves, how quickly he'd become one of the top and most explosive weapons in the NFL.
Lot of those receivers are playing with much better QB's, may I add.