He was a Beilein pick. because JB wanted to run a two PG offense like he's done his entire career.i'm starting to think garland is a beilein pick... i think altman picks are hardworking, aggressive guys. garland is so laid back, he'll be a perfect fit for the globetrotters.
LMAOHe was a Beilein pick. because JB wanted to run a two PG offense like he's done his entire career.
I've never heard a single bad thing about Garland's work ethic.i'm starting to think garland is a beilein pick... i think altman picks are hardworking, aggressive guys. garland is so laid back, he'll be a perfect fit for the globetrotters.
Why everyone still trying to push the John B on Gilbert when he said he had nothing to do with the hire? That’s on Altman. Unless there was an article stating otherwise? I remember the press conference where Gilbert said he didn’t even meet John B until Altman brought him in.I have theory's on Altman v Gilbert in terms of Cavs moves:
KI trade: Gilbert
Nance/JC/Hood/Hill trades: Altman
Sexton: Gilbert (Vardon kind of confirmed this one)
Beilien: Gilbert
JBB: Altman
Drummond: Gilbert
Garland: Altman
KPjr/Windler: Altman
Okoro: Altman
Allen/Prince: Altman
Now, I don't have anything but how I read these guys, but it does make sense that the Cavs have two competing voices on personnel decisions on a team that seems put together with mismatched parts.
It just seems to fit Gilbert's MO v the Cavs stated wants for a coach at the time (young coach, player development guy, G-League experience possibly). Gilbert likes splashy "win the presser" moves. I do remember the articles showing how it was worked by Cavs scouts/department people who had connections to Beilien.. maybe so.Why everyone still trying to push the John B on Gilbert when he said he had nothing to do with the hire? That’s on Altman. Unless there was an article stating otherwise? I remember the press conference where Gilbert said he didn’t even meet John B until Altman brought him in.