In general I think there is survivorship bias when looking at previous recessions and the great returns one would get if they had just pulled the trigger on the distressed securities
but the problem is the distressed securities that didn’t make it aren’t going to have a ticker. If you bought the dip on Lehman you were fucked. People buying the dip on Washington mutual.
It took almost 17 years for the airlines to recover to the pre 9/11 aggregate level
many banks and insurance companies have never gotten back to all time highs after 2008
It’s mostly a meme stock now, but GE used to be an absolute juggernaut often being the highest valued company in the world. Many died on that buy the dip hill
compared to these companies PENN is an absolute gnat. These were giant companies and I would have to imagine (wasn’t investing back then) that people made many of the same arguments of ‘wel it’s not like they’re going bankrupt’
What are your reasons for thinking Penn could not go bankrupt but an absolute behemoth like Lehman can?
I think some investors mindset is just whatever goes down will come back up. Looking at the top stock holdings for robinhood accounts (all retail investors) shows that people have drilled into their brain buy the dip no matter the fundamentals and target the most distressed securities.
Robintrack keeps track of how many Robinhood users hold a particular stock over time. It generates charts showing the relationship between price and popularity, and compiles some lists using the data.
robintrack.net
this is basically just a list of the most distressed securities (with some actually good companies who were hit hard). I’ll tell you as someone bag holding DAL, wish I would have taken that value play and dumped more into AAPL, MSFT, GOOG.