- Joined
- Jun 30, 2005
- Messages
- 20,458
- Reaction score
- 33,388
- Points
- 148
Nailed it.
What was the point of the Browns talking about how they didn't think Carson Wentz was any good during the week leading up to the game?
It still baffles me why they did that.... on multiple occasions.
Browns defense or not, he was pretty impressive.
That’s where past regimes really failed. We were always bad, but we’d win 3-6 games per year and a top QB was *just* out of reach. No more. Let’s fully commit to being terrible and actually get the top guy.
It's pretty true. Wouldn't you rather have Andrew Luck or Cam Newton right now?I can't believe anyone thinks that the problem with the Browns is that they've won too many games.
I can't believe anyone thinks that the problem with the Browns is that they've won too many games.
It's pretty true. Wouldn't you rather have Andrew Luck or Cam Newton right now?
I agree but with how horrible we have drafted through the years it would have been nice to just have a slow pitch softball no brainer pick like LuckI understand the sentiment. The problem I have with the argument is that there were good quarterbacks available when we picked that we did not select. We passed on Russell Wilson, we passed on Derek Carr, and we passed on Bridgewater, just to name a few.
It's pretty true. Wouldn't you rather have Andrew Luck or Cam Newton right now?
We've missed out on Andrew Luck, Cam Newton, Blake Bortles (hey he looks legit), Jameis Winston. This year alone Goff.
I understand the sentiment. The problem I have with the argument is that there were good quarterbacks available when we picked that we did not select. We passed on Russell Wilson, we passed on Derek Carr, and we passed on Bridgewater, just to name a few.
This team has sucked for 17 years.
That's approaching two decades. Think about that.
I'm really to the point of wanting to see them moved.