I doubt the Cavs have much interest in MKG anymore. Sounds like Davis and Beal were the 2 guys they wanted. I could see them take Barnes over MKG. Matter of fact, MKG may fall out of the top 5 all together.
Where'd all this come from?
I doubt the Cavs have much interest in MKG anymore. Sounds like Davis and Beal were the 2 guys they wanted. I could see them take Barnes over MKG. Matter of fact, MKG may fall out of the top 5 all together.
MKG is a nice hustle player but can't seem to find a highlight of him hitting a jumpshot ten feet or farther from the rim
I doubt the Cavs have much interest in MKG anymore. Sounds like Davis and Beal were the 2 guys they wanted. I could see them take Barnes over MKG. Matter of fact, MKG may fall out of the top 5 all together.
luckily, we really dont have a choice. makes it hard to fuck this one up.
mkg, beal or drummond, whoever isnt taken. youre out of your mind if you do aynthing else.
Moultrie is worth trading up for in my opinion, but I think he will continue to rise all the way up to the draft. Some mocks still have him around 24, but I don't think there's a chance he'll be there.
I do think what appeared to be conventional wisdom only last night has kind of fallen apart today. It does appear that just like last year this is a one man draft. I think after that it is a crapshoot. I think Barnes Robinson and lamb will rise. I think mkg with his hitch will drop as will Beal because of lack of height. Drummond is the great unknown. Every time I think I want the Cavs to draft him I remember that I also wanted them to draft Chris Washburn.
Just knowing that Harrison Barnes is an option makes me sick. I can live with Drummond or Robinson.
To me, Robinson is a lock to at least be a very good player (tier below all-star level).... Like many have said... a David West type..... That is a lock to me. I don't see any bust potential with him.
Drummond on the other hand..... I see huge bust potential. Actually, I think it is likely that he is a bust. But his potential makes him worth that risk. I'd be ok with either.
It would just be nice if we took Valanciunas last year and we could be more excited about Robinson filling a gaping PF hole. Irving, Robinson, Vala would look pretty nice right about now.
Why is that ridiculous?I would bet that Barnes, Thompson will be a better combo than Robinson and valanciunas. I know I will get ridiculed for that but I think Barnes may end up being the best pro after Davis in this draft. We will see!