SanduskyCav
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2008
- Messages
- 9,549
- Reaction score
- 13,346
- Points
- 123
I don't blame people for being tired of hearing the wins and losses argument. If you use other measures, such as QBR, McCown still didn't play as well or as consistently as Hoyer last season.
Most measures I'm looking at say Hoyer wasn't good in four games (JAX, HOU, BUF, IND) he was between effective to good in the other nine games. McCown played well against Washington but stunk to the depths of the Hoyer 3 game rough patch in nine games. I read reasons McCown wasn't as bad as the numbers suggest, I read reasons Farmer thought Hoyer was worse than the numbers suggest.
I personally feel like I'm getting sold a line, but then again this is all pre-free agency and nothing really matters until the pads go back on. Proof will play out if and when Hoyer is slinging the ball for another team and McCown is under center for the BRIGHT Orange and Brown.
What I think matters more to journalists trashing the move from Hoyer to McCown is what it represents in the grander scheme: Another year, another person who wanted to contribute leaving on bad terms with some bullheaded personalities at the top.
I agree. McCown is not better than Hoyer. However, at the same time McCown doesn't believe that he is better than he is, Hoyer does. Neither of them are the answer for the Browns. Farmer better have a fucking plan.
Last edited: