spydy13
NBA Starter
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2009
- Messages
- 4,284
- Reaction score
- 3,617
- Points
- 113
Yeah, JT Barrett isn't an NFL prospect.
Really? Why?
Too small? Too injury prone? He seems like he throws a decent ball to me and has good mobility.
Yeah, JT Barrett isn't an NFL prospect.
JT Barrett > shaw, manziel, weeden, campbell, lewis, mccoy, wallace, quinn, dorsey, gradkowski, frye, garcia, holocomb, pederson, wynn, detmer
give or take but you get the point. although i'm not sure if the point is that Barrett is a NFL prospect or that none of our QB's have been NFL prospects. haha
Yea I'm not sure what point you are trying to make. It's like saying Spam is more edible than dog crap. You don't want to eat either but 1 is definitely more edible.
It's cause he goes to OSU, majority of Browns fans want to take an OSU QB. Why? Look at the QBs we've gone through, what's one more? Don't believe me, just listen to sports radio in Cleveland.
Can anyone explain to me why you have a strong feeling either way about the Brian Hoyer vs Josh McCown discussion that's raging on Cleveland Sports Talk radio. I just listened to the RBS at lunch where Rizzo, Je'Rod and Pat McManamon were complaining about picking up McCown who was 1-10 last year as a starter. Hoyer was 10-6 as the Browns starter over 2 years. That's their basic argument. No consideration is given to fit, money, organizational structure. Nothing just 1-10 vs 10-6.
I mean I'm not exactly stoked McCown looks to be the starter next year but I view McCown and Hoyer as the same guy. MAYBE, MAYBE Hoyer is slightly better but if I had to grade them, Hoyer is a D+ and McCown is a D. Why are people spending so much time on QBs who are bad?
This team is the worst.
Why are people spending so much time on QBs who are bad?
Aside from a better offensive line, I see no reason why McCown has any better circumstances here.