NasstyNate
In the Rotation
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2010
- Messages
- 773
- Reaction score
- 729
- Points
- 93
I think the point that Redzone is making, and that I agree with, is that it is not about whether we traded for Love, it is how we did. It is not the regular Love v. Wiggins stuff, which is way too early to come to any conclusions.This thread, like so many others around here, is merely a case study in hindsight and tail chasing, nothing more. I, for one, am very happy with our roster as currently constructed (Griff has turned assets into quality players) and I cant wait until it really starts firing on all cylinders.
The reason I bumped this thread is because the situation, not the player, is relatively similar to what we faced in the summer. Comparing the players themselves gets away from the point - Love could have been in this same situation right now, and could have told the Wolves that he would not be re-signing and given them a list of teams he is willing to play for (Cleveland). In theory that would lower the Wolves' asking price. Dragic, though not as good as Love, might be doing just this, and it will be interesting to see what Phoenix gets to kind of test that theory.
Keep in mind I probably would have traded Wiggins for Love at the deadline. What we are arguing is that it likely wouldn't have cost Wiggins because Minnesota would not have been in any position to demand him. Maybe we give up Dion + AB instead.