• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Batman vs Superman spoilers thread

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
I think the second Thor and Avengers movies were both better than Iron Man 3. Honestly, I enjoyed the second Thor film for what it was. It was different, sure, but it wasn't bad.

And it made money because the first two Iron Man movies were great, so people naturally wanted to see the third one. It was destined to make a shitload of money. It's easily regarded as their worst film.

The second Thor movie was utterly forgettable to me. I just don't think that character is very interesting. Age of Ultron was aggressively mediocre, in my opinion. It wasn't bad, but coming off of Guardians I was totally let down and left wondering if I even enjoyed this stuff anymore (luckily Antman turned that around for me).

I thought Iron Man 2 was the one held as the low point in the MCU, but different strokes for different folks I guess?

Also, my guess for the high Iron Man 3 number is that it was the first movie after the first Avengers movie, which brought a whole shitload of new eyes to the series. That's part of the reason why I think they made a blunder with that movie by making it so secluded from of the other Avengers.
 
I think the second Thor and Avengers movies were both better than Iron Man 3. Honestly, I enjoyed the second Thor film for what it was. It was different, sure, but it wasn't bad.

And it made money because the first two Iron Man movies were great, so people naturally wanted to see the third one. It was destined to make a shitload of money. It's easily regarded as their worst film.

Agreed.

That money it made; count me in on that.. I saw it at the midnight release. One of the worst films I've ever seen.

Iron Man 3 was worse than The Force Awakens; by a country mile. Amazing, right?
 
Agreed.

That money it made; count me in on that.. I saw it at the midnight release. One of the worst films I've ever seen.

Probably also worth noting that, despite being Marvel's worst film, Iron Man 3 wasn't reviewed horribly. Fans didn't like it, but the reviews were generally pretty solid, and I think terrible reviews tend to have a greater impact on big releases like that then general fan opinion.

Like, Batman v Superman made a lot of money, but I think it would have made a lot more if it hadn't been pretty much universally panned by critics. Mediocre reviews won't really deter a major release, but awful ones will.
 
The second Thor movie was utterly forgettable to me. I just don't think that character is very interesting. Age of Ultron was aggressively mediocre, in my opinion. It wasn't bad, but coming off of Guardians I was totally let down and left wondering if I even enjoyed this stuff anymore (luckily Antman turned that around for me).

I thought Iron Man 2 was the one held as the low point in the MCU, but different strokes for different folks I guess?

Also, my guess for the high Iron Man 3 number is that it was the first movie after the first Avengers movie, which brought a whole shitload of new eyes to the series. That's part of the reason why I think they made a blunder with that movie by making it so secluded from of the other Avengers.

I think Guardians has to be the best Marvel movie by a mile. I felt that even Antman was very meh. Thor-verse I hate the treatment of Loki, Isnt he a vile and cunning schemer ? The movies show him as an impetuous and jilted villain who is easily outsmarted by Black Widow (Avengers).

Now that I think about it - Are there any bad-ass villains out there in the Marvel Movie world ? Loki was shown as weak, Ultron was bland despite putting James Spader, Whiplash was ok. Apart From Thanos who was more a guest appearance and Ronan in Guardians of the Galaxy I cant remember many villain who has the ominous screen presence.
 
I think Guardians has to be the best Marvel movie by a mile. I felt that even Antman was very meh. Thor-verse I hate the treatment of Loki, Isnt he a vile and cunning schemer ? The movies show him as an impetuous and jilted villain who is easily outsmarted by Black Widow (Avengers).

Now that I think about it - Are there any bad-ass villains out there in the Marvel Movie world ? Loki was shown as weak, Ultron was bland despite putting James Spader, Whiplash was ok. Apart From Thanos who was more a guest appearance and Ronan in Guardians of the Galaxy I cant remember many villain who has the ominous screen presence.

Guardians was great, no argument there. That, and Winter Soldier are my favorites.

I'm surprised you thought Ant-Man was "meh", I thought it was a really solid flick. It was a good heist movie with a lot of humor, and the visuals were awesome.

I also think Loki has been built up quite well. He's been written off as dead twice now, led an invasion on Earth, helped Thor defeat the Dark Elves, and is currently ruling Asgard. What more can they do to make him look strong?

The villains have been fine IMO. Ultimately, they're going to lose at the end of each movie and everything has been leading up to Thanos so far. The Captain America antagonists have been very good (Red Skull/HYDRA/Winter Soldier), Yellowjacket in Ant-Man, and Loki in every movie.

If you're looking for an ominous villain in every movie, you'll be left wanting. It's simply not what Marvel is trying to do.
 
Guardians was great, no argument there. That, and Winter Soldier are my favorites.

I'm surprised you thought Ant-Man was "meh", I thought it was a really solid flick. It was a good heist movie with a lot of humor, and the visuals were awesome.

I also think Loki has been built up quite well. He's been written off as dead twice now, led an invasion on Earth, helped Thor defeat the Dark Elves, and is currently ruling Asgard. What more can they do to make him look strong?

The villains have been fine IMO. Ultimately, they're going to lose at the end of each movie and everything has been leading up to Thanos so far. The Captain America antagonists have been very good (Red Skull/HYDRA/Winter Soldier), Yellowjacket in Ant-Man, and Loki in every movie.

If you're looking for an ominous villain in every movie, you'll be left wanting. It's simply not what Marvel is trying to do.

That is what the plot wanted out of Loki to make him look like a master villain but then they don't keep it up consistently. He was written of as dead at the end of the movie without an explanation of how he uses his cunning to get back. Also, Someone who managed to mastermind the Kree invasion of new york and can teleport does not teleport out of the area when the hulk is smashing him ? Or Black-Widow "manipulating" him into revealing his plan for the Hulk ? For a supposed smart villain, the plot writers made him look stupid.

Antman is more a comedy heist movie in the guise of being a superhero movie in my opinion. As a superhero movie i felt it was meh.

You are right in that i am looking for an ominous villain. Think Magneto in the Xmen movies, Heck even Doomsday in the panned Superman Vs Batman movie. You look at them and you knew the superheroes had to bond together to defeat them and that there is a very real threat that the SuperHeroes are over matched. Never felt that tension with Ant Man, Any of the baddies in Thor even Loki (i admit that Loki is more the manipulator than that kinda villain).

Where is Thanos, Where is Mandarin (Not the Iron Man 3 guy) Or Glactus Or Super Skrull in all their evil glory ?
 
Would be a great way to introduce Venom...

I've read rumors that this X-Men movie will be the last before Marvel reboots the X-Men within the MCU; and I see no reason the FF wouldn't follow suit given how poorly such a great franchise has done over the years.

Also the MSP (Magneto, Storm, Psylocke) lineup for the Horsemen in the upcoming movie is quite hilarious for anyone who is familiar with the Marvel fighting games; that was one of the best teams in the game, btw.

Ahhh Psylocke: that was was definitely one Jim Lee illustration that made trouble with a this teenagers lizard brain. Interesting that they are not doing the transformation story with her?

That is an underrated character to actually try a female solo with. Cool powers, ridiculously hot costume, and crossover to Asian audiences
 
Last edited:
I also think Loki has been built up quite well. He's been written off as dead twice now, led an invasion on Earth, helped Thor defeat the Dark Elves, and is currently ruling Asgard. What more can they do to make him look strong?

Honestly, Loki is like the one villain Marvel has done really well. Mostly because he's like the only one that has been left alive.
 
I'm pretty much sick of the superhero movies at this point. I didn't even bother with Age of Ultron. I think they are reaching the saturation point with the average audience. I think the new character movies (Dr. Strange, WonderWoman) have an opportunity to re-ignite my interest but I'm not holding my breath. Only series that could suck me back in is X-Men but I simply get annoyed with Hollywood continually trying to reinvent the wheel on these.
 
That is what the plot wanted out of Loki to make him look like a master villain but then they don't keep it up consistently. He was written of as dead at the end of the movie without an explanation of how he uses his cunning to get back. Also, Someone who managed to mastermind the Kree invasion of new york and can teleport does not teleport out of the area when the hulk is smashing him ? Or Black-Widow "manipulating" him into revealing his plan for the Hulk ? For a supposed smart villain, the plot writers made him look stupid.

Antman is more a comedy heist movie in the guise of being a superhero movie in my opinion. As a superhero movie i felt it was meh.

You are right in that i am looking for an ominous villain. Think Magneto in the Xmen movies, Heck even Doomsday in the panned Superman Vs Batman movie. You look at them and you knew the superheroes had to bond together to defeat them and that there is a very real threat that the SuperHeroes are over matched. Never felt that tension with Ant Man, Any of the baddies in Thor even Loki (i admit that Loki is more the manipulator than that kinda villain).

Where is Thanos, Where is Mandarin (Not the Iron Man 3 guy) Or Glactus Or Super Skrull in all their evil glory ?

Well, Thanos is coming and MCU doesn't have the rights to Galactus (yet... Fingers crossed) or the Skrulls (right? Or am I misremembering?).

You're right about Ant-Man, it's not a superhero movie. Marvel isn't really making superhero movies. Ant-Man was a comedy heist flick, Winter Soldier was a political thriller. That's what keeps these movies from getting stale. They're avoiding the hero vs big bad formula, and saving it for the big occasions (Infinity War).

You're not supposed to feel that tension in every single movie. It would get old. BvS was DC's version of the first Avengers movie. During the invasion of NYC, didn't you feel like the heroes were overwhelmed and on the edge of defeat until they finally bonded together?
 
I'm pretty much sick of the superhero movies at this point. I didn't even bother with Age of Ultron. I think they are reaching the saturation point with the average audience. I think the new character movies (Dr. Strange, WonderWoman) have an opportunity to re-ignite my interest but I'm not holding my breath. Only series that could suck me back in is X-Men but I simply get annoyed with Hollywood continually trying to reinvent the wheel on these.
You might have reached the point of not caring, but I'd say the audience is continuing to grow. I know so many people who are just starting to get into all this stuff. My 60 year old parents just started Daredevil on Netflix.

It may feel like they're trending down due to BvS's poor reception, but Marvel is booming. Everybody is watching the Netflix series, and Civil War is generating a ton of hype. Deadpool and X-Men, both outside the MCU are looking at big returns as well.
 
Well, Thanos is coming and MCU doesn't have the rights to Galactus (yet... Fingers crossed) or the Skrulls (right? Or am I misremembering?).

You're right about Ant-Man, it's not a superhero movie. Marvel isn't really making superhero movies. Ant-Man was a comedy heist flick, Winter Soldier was a political thriller. That's what keeps these movies from getting stale. They're avoiding the hero vs big bad formula, and saving it for the big occasions (Infinity War).

You're not supposed to feel that tension in every single movie. It would get old. BvS was DC's version of the first Avengers movie. During the invasion of NYC, didn't you feel like the heroes were overwhelmed and on the edge of defeat until they finally bonded together?


Wow - I did not know about the rights issues !! I thought since everything was Marvel - they could decide on everything. Fair enough on those points then.

The First Avengers movie was good and in all honesty we were just hyper excited for an Avengers movie and it checked all the right boxes. The second movie I expected them to up the ante and Ultron was a great choice but the climax fight just seemed similar to the one in the first movie. I guess like you said, I need to retune my expectations about the baddies.
 
Going to go see Civil War tonight...

Hoping it's as good as the previous Captain America movies and not just another Avengers flick. I am not a fan of the Avengers films, but have loved all the Cap movies so far.

Also, Spider-Man, my favorite superhero, makes his first MCU appearance.
 
Finally got around to seeing this, so I've now seen both Civil War and Batman V Superman.

First off, I assume that Lex Luthor figured out that Clark Kent is Superman because he's the only person in the DC universe with both eyes and a functional brain. :chuckle:

Anyway, I think the main problem with the movie, as has been brought up before in this topic, is that it just tries to do too many damn things for the second movie in a franchise. We're introduced to a totally new Batman with an entirely new backstory than the Batman we just got done watching a few years ago. We're introduced to Lex Luthor. We're introduced to Wonder Woman. We meet the Flash for about three seconds. We see kryptonite for the first time. Doomsday is involved. There's just so much shit going on here, and I think the problem is that it all feels unearned.

I think what DC really needed was a Batman reboot prior to this film that established the new Batman and what he is about, because we go from Nolan's "no kills" Bats to a goddamn lunatic and it's a little too jarring. For the record, I'm fine with Batman killing people, but I think that a set-up movie to this new Batman would have been very, very beneficial. This is especially true since he's easily the best part of the film. I found myself wishing the whole thing was just a Batman movie that flirted with expanding the DC universe in the future rather than the clusterfuck it actually becomes. Like, maybe start showing Batman's obsession with Superman and his first steps to secure kryptonite to bring him down, all while having him deal with a different main villain, but save the actual fight between the two for a future film?

I actually liked Eisenberg's performance a lot more than I thought I would. That said, I still don't like him as Lex Luthor. His portrayal just seems wrong for the part. He acts more like the Joker. I do like that he thoroughly outsmarted both Batman and Superman, and easily manipulates Superman into doing his bidding, but the weird, crazy way he plays the characters feels like it's just a totally new character. Honestly, it kind of reminds me of what they did to Baron Zemo in Civil War. The name is the same, but the character is so different that the name doesn't really matter.

Also, I'm no expert on DC geography, but should you be able to see Gotham from Metropolis? In that scene where you see the Bat signal from Lex's helipad they look like they're about a mile away from each other. I honestly thought at first that they were already in Gotham because it looked like the same city, just across the bay, but then later Clark tells Lois that he has to go to Gotham. It seems like the only city you might be able to see from Gotham is Bludhaven.

And I hate, hate, hate how the new Flash looks. He looks like a fucking hipster. The guy on the TV show is so perfect at the role (even if the show sometimes sucks) that it's a shame they recast the role in the films and did it so horribly wrong. Maybe he looks less godawful in his costume? I dunno, as you don't really get a clear look at it during that vision Bruce had.

That vision kind of underscores what is wrong with this film, though. Why is Bruce having visions of the future? I have to assume that was real, given that the Flash showed up, but that doesn't really explain why Bruce Wayne is able to have a vision of a possible future. Like, where did that come from? It was interesting, to be sure, but just totally unexplained. To Bruce, that would seem to just be a dream, yes? Does he normally base his actions on shit that happens in his dreams? I just don't really get the inclusion of that without any sort of explanation as to why or how it happened.

I'm equally uncertain as to why a combination of Kryptonian DNA and human DNA creates a cave troll from Lord of the Rings. Considering that Kryptonians look, you know, fucking identical to us, you'd think a combination of their DNA would look sort of human. I'm willing to let this one slide, but it's still kind of dumb. Further, Lex didn't appear to have any control over Doomsday. Did he have a backup plan if it killed Superman and Batman and then just proceeded to murder everyone on Earth, himself included? Also, why didn't Doomsday have a dick?

The Batman versus Superman fight was fun. It took some clear inspiration from The Dark Knight Returns, and that's fine, as the confrontation between Batman and Superman there is probably the best there is. I do question why Superman kept walking toward Batman knowing that Batman had all kinds of shit set up to fuck with him. Why not just stand still and be like, "Bro, Lex Luthor kidnapped my mom and then told me to come kill you." Might have saved a lot of time.

Still, what was even better was the awesome Batman fight scene after that where he went and saved Superman's mom. It left me wanting to see more of that and less of Superman fighting a giant abomination in a pretty by the numbers superhero/monster fight scene with no emotional investment involved. Again I found myself wishing that DC had just made a Batman movie and built up to a film like this one rather than just leaping in.

I feel like Wonder Woman's introduction was kind of lazy as well. This, again, is why some build-up movies prior to big team-ups like this are the way to go, as evidenced by Marvel. She's just kind of there early in the movie, and then shows up at the end because sure, why not. It's a good thing she got off that plane, though, or Batman would have gotten fucking roasted. If you contrast this with how Black Panther is handled in Civil War, his inclusion into the plot of that movie feels much more natural. I won't go into that in this thread for those of you who have yet to see it, but he's there for a reason and you understand his motivations. Spider-Man's inclusion is a bit more like Wonder Woman in this film, but I can at least give them somewhat of a pass on that one since Marvel got the rights to use him late in the game and wrote him in, whereas Black Panther has been a fundamental part of the film from the beginning.

Finally, I found the amount of time spent dwelling on Superman's death to be a little obnoxious considering that literally no one thinks he's actually dead for real. When you know a death is only temporary, there's no emotional attachment to it. It reminds me of when a certain Game of Thrones character was killed last year, only there was no emotional impact because basically everyone knew he was coming back. Contrast that with earlier deaths in the show and books and there is a very clear difference in the way I felt because those deaths felt like they mattered. And generally speaking, I think it was really dumb to kill Superman off in the second fucking movie of the new film universe. Killing off your most powerful character is something you do mid-to-late game. Not in the first half.

All in all, I'm glad I went into the thing with lowered expectations. There were parts of the movie that were good and a lot of fun, but there were plenty of parts that felt crammed in there and out of place. As a whole, it was just kind of a clusterfuck. Not an unenjoyable one, but a clusterfuck nonetheless. I really think that DC should have taken Marvel's approach and worked to build their universe and their characters before throwing them all into the pot together. Like, who the fuck is Wonder Woman and why is she in this movie? The movie certainly doesn't tell you. You'd also have no idea that it was the Flash who appeared to Bruce early in the movie unless you either read it online or were very familiar with the lore.
 
Finally got around to seeing this, so I've now seen both Civil War and Batman V Superman.

First off, I assume that Lex Luthor figured out that Clark Kent is Superman because he's the only person in the DC universe with both eyes and a functional brain. :chuckle:

Anyway, I think the main problem with the movie, as has been brought up before in this topic, is that it just tries to do too many damn things for the second movie in a franchise. We're introduced to a totally new Batman with an entirely new backstory than the Batman we just got done watching a few years ago. We're introduced to Lex Luthor. We're introduced to Wonder Woman. We meet the Flash for about three seconds. We see kryptonite for the first time. Doomsday is involved. There's just so much shit going on here, and I think the problem is that it all feels unearned.

I think what DC really needed was a Batman reboot prior to this film that established the new Batman and what he is about, because we go from Nolan's "no kills" Bats to a goddamn lunatic and it's a little too jarring. For the record, I'm fine with Batman killing people, but I think that a set-up movie to this new Batman would have been very, very beneficial. This is especially true since he's easily the best part of the film. I found myself wishing the whole thing was just a Batman movie that flirted with expanding the DC universe in the future rather than the clusterfuck it actually becomes. Like, maybe start showing Batman's obsession with Superman and his first steps to secure kryptonite to bring him down, all while having him deal with a different main villain, but save the actual fight between the two for a future film?

I actually liked Eisenberg's performance a lot more than I thought I would. That said, I still don't like him as Lex Luthor. His portrayal just seems wrong for the part. He acts more like the Joker. I do like that he thoroughly outsmarted both Batman and Superman, and easily manipulates Superman into doing his bidding, but the weird, crazy way he plays the characters feels like it's just a totally new character. Honestly, it kind of reminds me of what they did to Baron Zemo in Civil War. The name is the same, but the character is so different that the name doesn't really matter.

Also, I'm no expert on DC geography, but should you be able to see Gotham from Metropolis? In that scene where you see the Bat signal from Lex's helipad they look like they're about a mile away from each other. I honestly thought at first that they were already in Gotham because it looked like the same city, just across the bay, but then later Clark tells Lois that he has to go to Gotham. It seems like the only city you might be able to see from Gotham is Bludhaven.

And I hate, hate, hate how the new Flash looks. He looks like a fucking hipster. The guy on the TV show is so perfect at the role (even if the show sometimes sucks) that it's a shame they recast the role in the films and did it so horribly wrong. Maybe he looks less godawful in his costume? I dunno, as you don't really get a clear look at it during that vision Bruce had.

That vision kind of underscores what is wrong with this film, though. Why is Bruce having visions of the future? I have to assume that was real, given that the Flash showed up, but that doesn't really explain why Bruce Wayne is able to have a vision of a possible future. Like, where did that come from? It was interesting, to be sure, but just totally unexplained. To Bruce, that would seem to just be a dream, yes? Does he normally base his actions on shit that happens in his dreams? I just don't really get the inclusion of that without any sort of explanation as to why or how it happened.

I'm equally uncertain as to why a combination of Kryptonian DNA and human DNA creates a cave troll from Lord of the Rings. Considering that Kryptonians look, you know, fucking identical to us, you'd think a combination of their DNA would look sort of human. I'm willing to let this one slide, but it's still kind of dumb. Further, Lex didn't appear to have any control over Doomsday. Did he have a backup plan if it killed Superman and Batman and then just proceeded to murder everyone on Earth, himself included? Also, why didn't Doomsday have a dick?

The Batman versus Superman fight was fun. It took some clear inspiration from The Dark Knight Returns, and that's fine, as the confrontation between Batman and Superman there is probably the best there is. I do question why Superman kept walking toward Batman knowing that Batman had all kinds of shit set up to fuck with him. Why not just stand still and be like, "Bro, Lex Luthor kidnapped my mom and then told me to come kill you." Might have saved a lot of time.

Still, what was even better was the awesome Batman fight scene after that where he went and saved Superman's mom. It left me wanting to see more of that and less of Superman fighting a giant abomination in a pretty by the numbers superhero/monster fight scene with no emotional investment involved. Again I found myself wishing that DC had just made a Batman movie and built up to a film like this one rather than just leaping in.

I feel like Wonder Woman's introduction was kind of lazy as well. This, again, is why some build-up movies prior to big team-ups like this are the way to go, as evidenced by Marvel. She's just kind of there early in the movie, and then shows up at the end because sure, why not. It's a good thing she got off that plane, though, or Batman would have gotten fucking roasted. If you contrast this with how Black Panther is handled in Civil War, his inclusion into the plot of that movie feels much more natural. I won't go into that in this thread for those of you who have yet to see it, but he's there for a reason and you understand his motivations. Spider-Man's inclusion is a bit more like Wonder Woman in this film, but I can at least give them somewhat of a pass on that one since Marvel got the rights to use him late in the game and wrote him in, whereas Black Panther has been a fundamental part of the film from the beginning.

Finally, I found the amount of time spent dwelling on Superman's death to be a little obnoxious considering that literally no one thinks he's actually dead for real. When you know a death is only temporary, there's no emotional attachment to it. It reminds me of when a certain Game of Thrones character was killed last year, only there was no emotional impact because basically everyone knew he was coming back. Contrast that with earlier deaths in the show and books and there is a very clear difference in the way I felt because those deaths felt like they mattered. And generally speaking, I think it was really dumb to kill Superman off in the second fucking movie of the new film universe. Killing off your most powerful character is something you do mid-to-late game. Not in the first half.

All in all, I'm glad I went into the thing with lowered expectations. There were parts of the movie that were good and a lot of fun, but there were plenty of parts that felt crammed in there and out of place. As a whole, it was just kind of a clusterfuck. Not an unenjoyable one, but a clusterfuck nonetheless. I really think that DC should have taken Marvel's approach and worked to build their universe and their characters before throwing them all into the pot together. Like, who the fuck is Wonder Woman and why is she in this movie? The movie certainly doesn't tell you. You'd also have no idea that it was the Flash who appeared to Bruce early in the movie unless you either read it online or were very familiar with the lore.

I think the major problem has been, and will continue to be, Warner Brothers studio executives interfering. The reason Marvel is so singularly successful is because they have almost complete control over the property. They respect their source material and have a long-term process they have followed. No other studio would have ever allowed that much freedom of action. By nature, studios can care less about quality or even originality. Their bean counters tell them safe is profitable and that is the business model they will follow. Nolan's Batman Trilogy was dark, gritty and profitable. Ergo, everything has to be dark and gritty to be profitable. A shared cinematic universe was profitable for Marvel, therefore DC should do the same. Except in their minds DC is behind so it is necessary to cut corners.

We've seen Sony screw up Spiderman, Fox has ruined a few X-Men films (Age of Apocalypse is receiving dire reviews) and there is the travesty that is all Fantastic Four films. Already in the wake of BvS Warners is panicking and spent something like $25 million on reshoots four months before release to make Suicide Squad more like Deadpool after already deciding that because Heath Ledger's Joker was so popular that the entire film should be marketed on Leto's Joker.

The WB people are idiots and until someone (Snyder has failed) knocks some sense into them we can't expect great things. The whole Flash debacle is just an example. They never even considered Grant Gustin for the part (claiming he isn't right for the character!), or a light-hearted take on the Flash, and dismissed the success of the show because they are fixated on the Nolan model without realizing it isn't a universal template. Any studio that treats comic book source material so cavalierly isn't destined for success. It is the same reason there have been three failed Punisher movies and it is how Catwoman and Elektra got made. Fuck Warners. They have managed to fuck up a movie featuring Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman and the Flash. Great job.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-15: "Cavs Survive and Advance"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:15: Cavs Survive and Advance
Top