Might be time to move on, boss.
As a third party observer, I don't understand this. So I scrolled back and read the exchange from the start.
AZ_, you post a series of 3 videos in response to JDailey23 saying "Good for Houston. Watson acts like the Texans have been the Bengals or Browns his entire career. Be the change Watson" which show Jack Easterby speaking/preaching/"making comedy", and your comments with those videos are succinctly:
"Who wouldn't want to work with this guy?"
"Are we seriously saying that Watson isn't right to want to run for the fucking hills from this abortion of a management group?"
"I'm genuinely trying to understand why any professional athlete would want to play for a team with this guy making Football decisions."
In between the videos, you post a tweet about some administrative/executive personnel changes. With those tweets, you comment:
"C'mon DeShaun, do the right thing and stay for the good of the team."
"You owe them"
(You put these in quotes yourself)
And then through this, JDailey23 asks you what your argument is, repeatedly. He threw in the comment about him being white, which I think distracted from this greater point, but the questions stands.
WHAT IS YOUR ARGUMENT AZ_? I don't really see you making one anywhere. All you've done is post some videos and defended Watson's desire to leave because of how bad the management is. When JDailey23 asked you what was wrong with these videos, you didn't address that point but rather made it about his other comments. BUT THERE IS STILL NO ARGUMENT. You posted the videos, you made the comments quoted above, so I have to assume that the videos are your evidence for your position. The only thing in those videos is a guy being a preacher/speaker and his topic is Christianity. So because of that, he's a bad person to work for? That seems to be your argument. Is there more to it than that?
You then go on about how you shouldn't have to do the research for someone else, to put it nicely, and that it isn't worth your time to explain. That's fine. EXCEPT YOU POSTED THE VIDEOS AS EVIDENCE for how bad a guy he would be to play for as a football decision maker. So I think its fair that you should explain why those are evidence of your point, because it's the only evidence you've posted.
No one else brought those videos up. You did. So explain why. I seem to recall you saying "Be better" on quite a few occasions. This would be a good opportunity for you to live that advice.