Danny Salazar has the same amount of all-star appearances as Carlos Carrasco, Mike Clevinger, and Trevor Bauer combined.
Jason Kipnis and Jose Ramirez are tied in all-star appearances.
Obviously your better players will tend to make more all star games over a long career, but I don’t measure who a better player is based on that.
My next pick is Cliff Lee
Fuck Cliff Lee and his shitty ass in 2007 living in the minors while making the ALCS, then having a CY Young worthy 2008.
No, Wright’s was surprisingly not great even at his best with us.How did Dennis Martinez go before Cliff Lee (and CC)?
Shit, didn't Wright have at least one year that was better than Martinez?
With my 8th pick I'll select Elmer Flick. It's hard to pick hitters from the dead ball era and I know he's a fringe Hall of Famer but he is in the Hall and he has impressive numbers.
In four seasons from 1904-07 he was top 4 in the league every year in BA, OBP, SLG%, OPS, Off WAR, position player WAR, triples, stolen bases and Adjusted OPS+. His wRC+ was 155, 163, 150 and 152 and fWAR was 6.6, 5.7, 6.7 and 6.1. You could pick any of those years but I like 1905 when he led the league in BA, OPS, OPS+, offensive WAR, triples and adjusted OPS+. He was second in on base percentage, stole 35 bases and had 18 outfield assists. All time for the Tribe he's 3rd in triples, 7th in adjusted OPS+, and 15th in offensive WAR.
He'll be my leadoff man. So my order so far goes - Flick, Sewell, Jackson, Rosen, tba, Gordon.
I think @sportscoach is up.
While the measure wasn't used until more recently, it's helpful to apply it to other eras, so that you can measure a player vs their league environment. In Flick's case especially, it makes him look more impressive than his raw numbers would suggest.Love the pick but only WAR that meant anything in those days was fought with guns