prf100
All-Star
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2008
- Messages
- 3,351
- Reaction score
- 8,822
- Points
- 113
Meh, it deserves a 0. You bring up a good point about Jane.Not at all, just rifting off of your joke.
Meh, it deserves a 0. You bring up a good point about Jane.Not at all, just rifting off of your joke.
Meh, it deserves a 0. You bring up a good point about Jane.
Actually I thought it was funny.
I almost commented with Harris that cutting him we lose a very good opportunity to have the most improved player on our team as he was ranked 44 out of 44 tight ends with as many targets.
Meh, it deserves a 0. You bring up a good point about Jane.
Since the new regime literally just came in, are there any players on the roster other than players from the previous regime?
Seems unnecessary to word it that way.
Most of these bullets aren’t telling me anything other than he’s durable. Cam Erving is a super bowl champ who has started a lot of games. Those bullets should have just been ommited.
We need to be at his door minute 1
Most of these bullets aren’t telling me anything other than he’s durable. Cam Erving is a super bowl champ who has started a lot of games. Those bullets should have just been ommited.
We need to be at his door minute 1
He's going to be expensive. Roger Saffold signed a 4/$44M deal last year, and he wasn't first or second team All-Pro the year before. So you're likely looking at $12+/year to sign Thuney, and he doesn't fill either of our two greatest positional needs -- OT and S. If we're going to spend money on a top-tier FA, I'd rather he be at a true position of need. I think @Urban also makes a good point about him playing LG. If you're paying a guy All-Pro money -- and we'd be paying that to both of our starting guards, you should at least play the guy at the position at which he has had his most success.