Out of the Rafters at the Q
Out of the Rafters
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2008
- Messages
- 26,113
- Reaction score
- 55,544
- Points
- 148
I don't think there's any legitimate concern about an unauthorized agent seeing/hearing the contents of a Zoom call. The easiest way for that to happen would be to hack the person--not the service. I'd go about trying to get the password from someone, either by accessing their email, physically stealing their phone, or other methods.Schefter said teams are worried about other teams hacking into their Zoom virtual call now
This is going to be insane. Isn't it as simple as placing a super long, weird ass password? Why wouldn't they do Facetime then? How can someone hack into a "phone call?"
the NFL must have some sort of secured connections set up between them and all of the teams. Like you said there are a ton of other options out there.I don't think there's any legitimate concern about an unauthorized agent seeing/hearing the contents of a Zoom call. The easiest way for that to happen would be to hack the person--not the service. I'd go about trying to get the password from someone, either by accessing their email, physically stealing their phone, or other methods.
But, Zoom has a long list of vulnerabilities. Here's a quick, high-level breakdown:
Zoom vulnerabilities keep coming, two more reported today - 9to5Mac
It seems hardly a day can go by without more Zoom vulnerabilities being discovered – with not just one but two more being revealed today ...9to5mac.com
Facetime would be unacceptable for a large meeting like this. There are other alternatives to Zoom I would use in this situation. Webex, GoToMeeting, Teams, Hangouts, etc.
Schefter said teams are worried about other teams hacking into their Zoom virtual call now
This is going to be insane. Isn't it as simple as placing a super long, weird ass password? Why wouldn't they do Facetime then? How can someone hack into a "phone call?"
I like the helmet phone idea personally . . .the NFL must have some sort of secured connections set up between them and all of the teams. Like you said there are a ton of other options out there.
Food for thought:
Predicts 9-7/8-8 season.
This is about where I am at right now, too. I just think there is a ton of variability. I could see the team going 6-10 again, but just as likely see them rallying around Stefanski and finishing 11-5.Food for thought:
Predicts 9-7/8-8 season.
Food for thought:
Predicts 9-7/8-8 season.