raiders91sc
In the Rotation
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2014
- Messages
- 722
- Reaction score
- 738
- Points
- 93
I totally agree with ur last part. If its in Brookpark I doubt I even stay in a hotel. My young adult kids love to stay downtown. Restaurants, bars, gambling, entertainment and Browns game is a very good weekend. Everything in the old buildings within walking distance. Not gonna happen in Brookpark.I don't think many people are really against the dome idea. I think most of us here are on board with that.
I also think most agree that renovating the current stadium makes little to no sense. Whatever you add or restructure in the current stadium won't have the impact of a dome. Really I don't know what they can do to make stuff that much better at the current stadium. People come to watch the Browns, it's not like they come to hang out like with the Guardians and the stuff they changed with progressive field.
I think the debate is really where the new stadium should be. I think it would be bad for the city of Cleveland for it to leave. If the Haslams build in Brookpark it will pull money away from the city of Cleveland. I've said that eastsiders probably won't go to whatever they build around the stadium if it's in Brookpark outside of going to browns game and maybe some concerts. It will be an entertainment complex for the Westside. That being said I think if it's a good entertainment complex, then Westsiders are less likely to go downtown during the weekends. Visitors will be less likely to stay downtown if they are coming for Browns games or events at the new Brookpark complex. It's just unnecessary money being pulled away from the city of Cleveland which they need more than Brookpark does.