Agreed 100%. Not saying Garland and Sexton are guaranteed to meet their full potential as a combo, but what exactly does “impeding both players from progressing” mean? Defensively maybe, but Giving Garland more time on the floor without sexton doesn’t do anything for Garland other than take away a scorer. Trading away Sexton and bringing in a wing or big with upside does what exactly? Other than automatically eliminating 15 points that Sexton will put up. Is Garland going to make that up? Unless Garland becomes a 30ish PPG scorer than is a wasted effort - and how long would it take Garland to get to that level anyways? Plus, I think Garland is too much of a facilitator to get to a 30 pt. Avg. (at least in the next 3-4 yrs). He is not a Curry IMO, his passing comes more natural than Curry’s. It’s true that Sexton and Garland maybe shouldn’t co-exist in the same lineup, but there’s no way you pull the plug anytime soon, before Garland gets his feet wet, Sexton settles into year two, and their chemistry starts to build.