Urshela was a bust until he got to New York so technically he has to be added to the success department...
Also you two have different definitions so this argument won't honestly be anything but comparing apples to oranges type of deal...
@CDAV45 @CATS44
Maybe we should kind of get a standard system that everyone agrees on that says whether or not a prospect is a bust or not... How many fWAR after 5 seasons after MLB debut due they need to be considered a non-bust? I think by that time normally a player has had enough time to prove one way or they other...
But the expectations are that our upper level prospects are gonna produce instantly.
Morgan or one of the others will come close to equaling Plesac or Civale. We can easily replace Ameds production tomorrow.
By that definition, and by history, there is a 16% chance that either one will happen.
There is no way that anybody can list Urshela as a success for us.
And thats the point. Many don't want to trade any of our upper level prospects, esp for a known player, because that player may be 'only' a 2-2.5 WAR player.
I wish we had a roster full of 2-2.5 WAR players to go with JRam.
We don't want to trade anything of value for an Ian Happ or a McNeil. Many want to trade away Gimenez, because he hasn't been an instant star.
And yet, if projected over 600 PAs...a full season...all three are close to 3 WAR players or better.
Put Amed at short every day and don't screw around with him. The same with Gimenez at second. The same with Straw in center.
Fix what needs to be fixed by using the excess MIF talent we have in the minors. Dont mess with what doesn't need fixed.