- Joined
- Jul 15, 2008
- Messages
- 34,090
- Reaction score
- 64,364
- Points
- 148
He was acquired when we had a huge hole and not the best array of players available to plug it.
I didn't like this rationale for acquiring Lavert - to fill temporary holes caused by injuries. At this point in this rebuild, I think we should have been focused on the longer term.
But I think LeVert will have some value in a trade package. And to me it seems like that's where it will end up with him.
What do you expect "some value" to be? Because I don't like the idea of having given up a first round pick for a rental unless the rental is much better than Lavert.