Triplethreat
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2008
- Messages
- 12,897
- Reaction score
- 12,760
- Points
- 123
Baker is better lol
We basically give up all over rollover cap space and available cap space for Cousins if I'm understanding correctly? Trading for him locks us into win now mode and makes it significantly more difficult to retain our guys. It also means Baker has to be moved too, either before or after the deal and it maybe not be easy to move him. It isn't as clear cut of a decision as we all want it to be.$35M is not a lot for a good starting QB like Kirk Cousins. QB contracts are quickly becoming the new NBA Max contracts. People are still looking at the numbers under the old cap and the old system. You have to look at it from the new money perspective.
Ideally, sure, but I think we have to be realistic. I don't think either of them have much interest in coming to Cleveland for a number of reasons. Getting Watson, Wilson or Rodgers is a pipe dream, and if we have the opportunity to get Cousins without giving up too much, we can't afford to sit on our hands waiting for a miracle.Wait for the shoe to drop on Watson and Russ before you start offering a 1st for Cousins.
True, especially if you're getting a healthy Baker back in the deal. You're probably looking at another season slightly under .500 in that instance, unless, like you said, you guys make additional rebuilding moves.Again, trading Cousins isn't enough for that team/group of talent to be "tanking" bad.
This makes sense for Cleveland, but not for Minnesota. They're not going to give you Cousins out of charity.
Why would Minnesota do this? Everyone saw how bad Baker was.
Any burial grounds in the area for those guys or anything?The addiction of feeling pain.
Any burial grounds in the area for those guys or anything?
We basically give up all over rollover cap space and available cap space for Cousins if I'm understanding correctly? Trading for him locks us into win now mode and makes it significantly more difficult to retain our guys. It also means Baker has to be moved too, either before or after the deal and it maybe not be easy to move him. It isn't as clear cut of a decision as we all want it to be.
Cousin makes as much as Pat Mahomes will make yearly next season in base salary. No matter how you try to frame it that is a tough pill to swallow and should be a big factor in whether we give them a first round pick or not.
What about the Saints win?The Vikings lost the Ed Thorp Trophy when it was still the NFL Championship and they've been raw dogged on national TV every post season appearance since.
What about the Saints win?
I mean, someone is going to give Baker a chance in 2022 to see what he can do when healthy. If it's not the Browns, or the Vikings, it will be someone else. For the Vikings (or anyone else, really), he either proves he's good enough to move forward with or proves he's not good enough to move forward with. And they're getting at least an additional 1st round pick in the process. It's a one year deal...either a bridge to a rebuild or the start of a retool.Why would Minnesota do this? Everyone saw how bad Baker was.
I didn't even think of this. Ugh. His familiarity with the Browns can be a plus, but in this case...it probably isn't.Kwesi's first major move in his career as Vikings GM is to trade Kirk for Baker and a measly 1st?
For the delusional folks in the backKwesi's first major move in his career as Vikings GM is to trade Kirk for Baker and a measly 1st?