Cavatt
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2008
- Messages
- 29,261
- Reaction score
- 38,444
- Points
- 148
I actually strongly agree with the bolded, but I think it proves my point more. If we were in the playoffs, teams would let Collin go for 40 and try and take garland out of the game because we would have 0 ball movement and play to their advantage. I also disagree with the idea of “going and getting it”. Thats not always just scoring, and can be a multitude of things from running a PnR to iso, both of which garland is better at in terms of getting the defense out of position and making a play.
It’s just my opinion but I think teams would be neutralizing sextons impact by letting him go for 40 and hunkering down on everyone else. That’s actually hurting the cavs more in a playoff game than it would help. Taking garland out of the game would be more advantageous to the opposing team then letting Collin go for 40 in a clunky offense.
I again want to make clear, I don’t think they need to trade Collin or Darius now, but by august I imagine we will know which way they are leaning in relation to the future based on roster construction and potential sexton extension/draft pick choice.
Sure, but also they can't focus in on Garland and take him out when Sexton is by his side.
A lot of the guys on the team simply can't score though. Run the pick and roll all you want. Long stretches of every one of those games without Sexton where guys can't score on the other team. There were scoring droughts almost every game and often they were "playing the right way".
Sexton is really good playing the drive and kick. Had a lot of good games kicking to Wade and Kevin and even a couple with Windler and Cedi.
Garland can't do that yet.
I don't think either guy is at his peak, and trading either one without a clear upgrade or even lateral move in talent seems insane to me. Take green and then maybe we talk about trading Sexton. Doing it without someone to shoulder that load and you have made a major mistake.