The Voice
Best in the World
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2007
- Messages
- 14,819
- Reaction score
- 5,377
- Points
- 113
I think as a rule going forward that should be something the Browns avoid.
If you finish in the top 10? don't trade down. If it's player for player (like eli for rivers)? Sure. But I've just never seen it work out in any other circumstance. You can say "Well, the Browns", but even the Rams when they did it? It didn't pan out:
https://www.si.com/nfl/2016/03/07/washington-redskins-st-louis-rams-robert-griffin-trade-players
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/...-the-rg3-trade-between-the-redskins-and-rams/
It's stupid. Take a blue chipper. Punting a Julio Jones for what would up becoming Phil Taylor (a solid starter, but a type of guy who's production you've found later on), Greg Little and fucking Brandon Weeden? Holy hell. Don't.
So the whole 5 times you've seen it, it didn't work out. That's not large enough sample size and any good GM is going to argue that the team that traded down didn't pick right.
I raise you the mark Sanchez deal. We got Alex Mack out of it and they got a hot dog eater on the bench.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk