As long as you admit that you've cherry picked one stat, your first, to try and make this argument that he's not a good pitcher.
Which he is, and Urban/Derek already laid out.
Its not really up for debate, from a statistical perspective. You were already proven wrong, but you're certainly welcome to say that you don't care about the stats and your opinion is based in something outside of that.
But within the constructs of the multiple fallacy arguments you presented, your opinion is that he's bad. So I guess that's something...